Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation’s history. Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by new ones. How important is it to maintain old buildings? Should history stand in the way of process?
There is an opinion that it is not necessary to conserve old architectures. In fact, some people think these buildings should be destroyed to make room for new ones. In my views, I believe these old houses not only display a country’s historical culture but also offer great benefits.
On the one hand, the ancient buildings is much beneficial to be maintained with conservative efforts. By keeping these buildings intact, the diversity of the cities’ structure will not be restricted in just modern high towers or skyscrapers. Such variety in architecture will make the cities more vibrant with both ancient and modern buildings blending together in harmony. Furthermore, these old houses are the sites to attract tourists from many countries around the world. Therefore, the conservation of the old architecture will eventually bring profits to the economy.
On the other hand, the process to achieve approval for the demolition of historical structures could be interrupted by history. Firstly, since the majority of people still worship the ancestors, these structures become the spiritual places to remember their history. Hence, these particular individuals will absolutely not agree to destroy the historic properties. Secondly, for educational purposes, the ancient structures are the evidences of historical stories that are passed down through generations. Without these buildings, all the tales or legends about the ancestors will be forgotten in the future. Thus, it will lead to the demise of a country’s historic culture.
In conclusion, despite the fact that the cities need to construct more modern buildings, maintaining old ones still offers large benefits and in the same time, conserve the country’s history.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-04 | drtruong92 | 61 | view |
| 2017-07-18 | MonicaSanta | 61 | view |
- Most countries want to improve the standard of living through economic development; however, others think the social value is lost as a result of economic development. To what extend do you think the advantages of economic development outweigh its disadva 78
- Nowadays many people work part or full time from home. Some people say that working from home has many benefits while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- You work at home and have a problem with a piece of equipment that you use for your job. (computer)Write a letter to the shop or company which supplied the equipment. In your letter•describe the problem with the equipment (cannot turn on, suddenly turn 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Only people who earn a lot of money are successful. 73
- Write a letter to complain about a situation in which some adolescents let their dogs run wildly causing a dangerous situation. 64
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, in conclusion, in fact, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1492.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5671641791 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04869699259 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589552238806 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.1208397487 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4666666667 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8666666667 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.73333333333 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224256567533 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0752093000327 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663750085132 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14354846912 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0700345085532 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.73 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.