Adolescents and children are more involved in criminal activity in various regions of the globe. This trend of affairs can be attributed to several factors, and this essay will suggest viable solutions to remedy the situation.
The proliferation of violent video games is one of the major factors in the rise of criminal activity among young people. This can be seen in the popularity of downloading violent games like Pubg, Free Fire, and Lien Quan Mobile on mobile devices running Apple's iOS or Google's Android operating systems. To exemplify this point, a 2021 study by Google found that six out of ten Vietnamese children had downloaded at least one violent video game onto a mobile device and that youths there typically spent three to four hours per week playing such games. Google, while discussing the repercussions of violent gaming among youngsters in the report, also claimed that prolonged exposure to such games leads children to act aggressively and resolve conflicts through violence, making them more likely to breach the law. Another reason for the increase in juvenile crime is the loophole in the Vietnamese government's policy, which does not punish offenders under the age of 18 with the same severe penalties meted out to adult counterparts. As a result of this loophole, children and teenagers would take advantage and commit crimes with the full knowledge that they would receive the leniency of the law.
There has to be collaboration between the administration and the people of the community in order to find a solution to this issue. The first step is for the government to take measures to reduce the possibility of juveniles abusing the loophole in the legal system. Juvenile criminals need to be severely punished by the law so that they would be deterred and learn to control their conduct. In addition, lawmakers should impose regulations on the video game industry, such as making developers confirm the age and identity of players in violent games, which would lessen the likelihood that young people would be exposed to violent content online. In the second step, schools need to provide instruction with a criminal justice focus, which would make young people aware of the serious consequences of criminal behavior. Finally, families may help reduce juvenile delinquency by ensuring their children get a good education and are properly disciplined. It is crucial for parents to be able to establish an indoor surveillance system and to have the correct upbringing in order to identify their children's misbehavior and help them comprehend and not repeat these habits.
In conclusion, there are several causes for concern about the rising adolescent crime rate. The essay has mentioned common contributing factors to this issue, including the proliferation of violent video games and legal loopholes. The government-to-person solutions that have been presented to assist handle the topic more comprehensively.
- Many different countries have most shops and products as the same Some consider it a positive dvelopment whereas others consider it negative Discuss both sides and give your opinion 14
- A lot of places in the world rely on tourism as a main source of income Unfortunately tourism can also be a source of problems if it is not managed correectly Describe the advantages and disadvantages of tourism in the mordern world Do you think that be 89
- When choosing a job the salary is the most important consideration To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online Is this a positive or negative development 84
- Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later and it is often argued that these are the best people to talk about the dangers of committing a crime To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, may, second, so, while, as to, at least, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 41.998997996 174% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2483.0 1615.20841683 154% => OK
No of words: 472.0 315.596192385 150% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26059322034 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6610686524 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84255956731 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 264.0 176.041082164 150% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559322033898 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 781.2 506.74238477 154% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.9764752141 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.944444444 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2222222222 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191700150718 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591511737315 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490270484604 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116094425622 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300822291204 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 145.0 78.4519038076 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, may, second, so, while, as to, at least, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 41.998997996 174% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2483.0 1615.20841683 154% => OK
No of words: 472.0 315.596192385 150% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26059322034 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6610686524 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84255956731 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 264.0 176.041082164 150% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559322033898 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 781.2 506.74238477 154% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.9764752141 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.944444444 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2222222222 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191700150718 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591511737315 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490270484604 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116094425622 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300822291204 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 145.0 78.4519038076 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.