In many parts of the world, people now often throw things away when they are broken and buy new ones, whereas in the past broken things were repaired and used again. Why do you think this is the case?
What problems may it lead to?
Nowadays people throw their things away frequently when they become unsuitable to utilize and purchase new ones the instead of them. That is becoming a very vital issue in recent years. Despite the growing concern on this issue, little progress has been made in this field. There are some factors that account for why this has happened. In my opinion this situation can be remedied providing that some reasonable steps are taken to improve.
Surprisingly, the most serious consequences of wasting broken goods is that in these days there are a number of manufacturers and the competition between them. The leaders of the fabrications always try to produce things immediately and also cheaper than other opponent's products. They make a large amount of attracting advertisements in order to sell their products. That's why the enthusiasm of people is growing to purchase new things day by day. Then the majority of people prefer buying new ones instead of the thing which is broken as they consider it is more acceptable than to fix the items. This is because it demands much time and money. With the help of adding some amount of money people can buy new ones exchange for them. They usually spend plentymoney unknowingly and as a result they may damage their financial budget.
Another cause of this problem is that most of the youngsters do not appreciate the goods which are boughty by their parents. They do not know that how it is difficult to earn money and they usually toss their unfit things. After several time we can see them in the garbages or in the streets. Children can buy easily new ones with the help of their parents. The reason behind this is that parents attempt to organize their children's daily life without any necessity. And also children may loss to the ecology wiht throwing their broken things away. Among them there are those that can not be recycled and that do not rot. That is a global topic in the world.
In summary, affordability and marketing campaigns have given rise to consumerism and the new throw-away culture. If we do not restrict them at once the mentioned conundrum may damage the enviroment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-19 | Qudrat2003 | 54 | view |
- A glance at the picture provides an illustration of how an orange juice is manufactured 56
- We cannot help everyone in the world that needs help so we should only be concerned with our own communities and countries To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- Some people regard video games as harmless fun or even as a useful educational tool Others however believe that videos games are having an adverse effect on the people who play them In your opinion do the drawbacks of video games outweigh the benefits 61
- Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
- The best way to solve the world s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 369, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...ements in order to sell their products. Thats why the enthusiasm of people is growing...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 431, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'things'' or 'thing's'?
Suggestion: things'; thing's
...sm of people is growing to purchase new things day by day. Then the majority of people...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 592, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er it is more acceptable than to fix the items. This is because it demands much t...
^^
Line 3, column 749, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...new ones exchange for them. They usually spend plentymoney unknowingly and as a r...
^^
Line 5, column 38, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Another cause of this problem is that most of the youngsters do not appreciate...
^^^
Line 5, column 232, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun time seems to be countable; consider using: 'several times'.
Suggestion: several times
... usually toss their unfit things. After several time we can see them in the garbages or in t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 478, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ily life without any necessity. And also children may loss to the ecology wiht th...
^^
Line 7, column 135, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hrow-away culture. If we do not restrict them at once the mentioned conundrum may...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, then, thus, in summary, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 24.0651302605 191% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1778.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8446866485 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54122803241 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539509536785 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.9164371647 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.3043478261 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9565217391 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 7.06120827912 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287810350747 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757148877735 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633251789369 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166335675452 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047585322578 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.0946893788 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.