It is true that work-life balance is being everyone's issue nowadays. People are trying hardly to stabilize their work and private life. However, most of them still struggling. This essay will outline the factors that contribute to the fail of maintaining work-life balance and propose solutions to answer the problem.
Being professional in work and happy in private life at the same time is now be a hard nut to crack. There are two possible reasons behind this phenomenon. Firstly, the heavy workload that should be done in a relative short deadline given by the companies is the main cause. The employees will be pushed to reach their work target in order to make companies earn bigger profits. Furthermore, the other reason of failing in achieving proportional work-life balance is due to poor personal management of the employees itself. Most of people usually procrastinate their tasks especially if the tasks is hard. Hence, they will get burn out to finish their tasks especially when the deadline are getting closer.
To mitigate this issue, two possible solutions could be proposed. The first suggestion is for the companies that could arrange extra holiday for their employee who successfully fulfill their target. Additionally, it is essential for employees to make time table in order to organize their tasks daily, weekly, or even monthly. In consequence, they can focused on their target and also being relax with their family or loved ones.
In conclusion, balancing work and lives is caused by heavy workload and procrastination. However, holiday rewards and organizing work training could be proposed as solutions.
- Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar which causes many health problems Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar Do you agree or disagree 67
- The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart illustrates consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- the table below shows the percentage of main types of dwelling in Victoria the Northern Territory and Tasmania Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make a comparison where relevant 67
- Many teenagers now have their own smart phone Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this and give your own opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 78, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...in private life at the same time is now be a hard nut to crack. There are two poss...
^^
Line 3, column 525, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'Most of', you should use 'the' ('Most of the people') or simply say ''Most people''.
Suggestion: Most of the people; Most people
...nal management of the employees itself. Most of people usually procrastinate their tasks espec...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 353, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'focus'
Suggestion: focus
... even monthly. In consequence, they can focused on their target and also being relax wi...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 176, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...raining could be proposed as solutions.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, still, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1379.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2433460076 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76845252734 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577946768061 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.9349930053 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.1176470588 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4705882353 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64705882353 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219178182854 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0719255518685 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532143668896 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138861663476 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0397955582497 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.