many people argue that in order to improve the quality of education high school students are encouraged to comment or even criticize their teachers. others believe that this will lead to loss of respect and discipline in the classroom. discuss both perspectives and give your opinion.
It is often debatable that, teenagers would raise their voices or give suggestions against the teachers to improve the educational quality. Whereas, some claimed that it would be misbehaviour or malpractice of school students in the classroom itself. However, in my perspective, students must give respect and reverence to their elder teachers would enhance the quality and meaning of education.
On the one hand, people who think the changing attitude of students toward their teachers argue that students have the credibility and right to question. This would help the teachers to improve their teaching methods, and they can put their maximum on the student's refurbishment. For instance, questioning regarding the way of teaching or asking doubts about certain chapters often enhance the children's knowledge as well as teachers' attitude toward students. Moreover, students got a chance to question their teachers would develop leadership quality in later life and they can point out the problems and issues inside the society to some extent. For example, student political members are often find their carrier in political parties or governmental authorities.
On the other hand, respect and modesty would be develop from the school and from the teachers. The mani notion of education is modesty, manners, and able to practice moral values effectively. Such characters and attitude would eventually formulate from school and through studies. Therefore, accomplishment of education work out from the qualified teachers and well-wishers and thereby criticize or questioning of teachers would in turn devastating. Meanwhile, students can ask doubts and clarification in a proper manners and with due respect that might help them to improve their academic performance and future too. Along with that, students must able to learn classroom manners and convey their attributes to others would be the exact value of education rather than opposing the teachers.
To sum up, it is acceptable to ask doubts and get ride of mistakes from teachers despite following good manners and discipline would be the best in classroom.
- the chart below shows the number of jobs in tourism related industries in one UK cities between 1989 and 2009 82
- the chart below show the film participation in Australia and also shows the typical film trips of different age groups from 1996 to 2000 take a look at the data and select and announce key highlights 79
- some people believe that government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion Other think that building more wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion Discuss both view and give your opinion 73
- the accompanying pie illustrations show the use of web based social networking y people in Australia in 2011 and 2014 73
- the diagram describe the structure of a home smokery and how it works tp summarise information by selecting key characteristics an compiling a report 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 17, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eaning of education. On the one hand, people who think the changing attitude o...
^^
Line 3, column 258, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
..., and they can put their maximum on the students refurbishment. For instance, questionin...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, well, whereas, while, for example, for instance, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 24.0 10.4138276553 230% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1798.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48170731707 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.819256624 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52743902439 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.9729051959 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.866666667 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8666666667 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53333333333 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25508677336 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0921454932752 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039782324064 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151527779854 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469434486792 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.