Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are reasons? Solutions to change negative attitudes?

Essay topics:

Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are reasons? Solutions to change negative attitudes?

It is widely know that, despite receiving a great number of tourists every year, museums and historical sites do not attract as many local residents. This essay is going into the reasons why this problem exists, along with suggesting possible ways to solve it.
The difference in the number of these two types can be caused by a variety of reasons. First of all, museums are mainly to educate about the local area. This provides a chance for those who have little knowledge of the history and traditions of the place. However, local residents are most likely to already be familiar with these aspects since they have been inhabiting there for most of their lives. Secondly, in modern days, people are more appealed to exciting and thrilling experiences. Therefore, rather than spending a day to have a dreary visit to some historical places, people would prefer to participate in an eventful activity, which museums and historical sites fail to provide.
The solution to this is in fact feasible. As people tend to seek out for fun adventures, what can be added into the process is entertainment purposes. Games can be organized, with both educational and pleasurable activities. Furthermore, local authorizations should encourage their residents, to at times pay a visit to these local sites. It is one way to truly get to know about their surroundings also to preserve the traditional aspects of the area.
In conclusion, the inability to provide new knowledge stimulating experience to local inhabitants may only be solved if alterations in the system are made.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-01-23 Tinh Cao Van 73 view
2019-01-23 Tinh Cao Van 73 view
Essays by user Tinh Cao Van :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 14, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'known'.
Suggestion: known
It is widely know that, despite receiving a great number ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, in conclusion, in fact, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1311.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06177606178 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83098745052 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.625482625483 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5920523874 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6428571429 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07142857143 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103441569218 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0337112383223 0.084324248473 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0294083930877 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0544662749328 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387926600751 0.056905535591 68% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.