Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their countries. What are the reasons for this? What can be done to change this negative attitude towards international tourism?
Many individuals opine that foreign tourists bring negative effects to their countries. It is hard for overseas visitors to acclimatize themselves with the culture of the destination. However, can be reversed, with strategic steps by a government.
There are several reasons for the resistance of the resident to tourists. Firstly, the way of the attitude of international tourists is often harmful to culture and tradition customs. Since many tourists are careless and insensitive about their emotions and behaviours. For instance, "Isfahan" is full of the holy historical place. Inappropriate foreign visitor clothes and Failure to follow provisions would cause discomfort and anger among locals. Secondly, foreign tourists are often criticized for their contribution to environmental degradation. The waste disposal such as water cans, paper and so on by tourists, are the main factors leading to water, air & soil contamination.
Nonetheless, the negative impacts of global tourists can be reduced by the government's awareness campaigns to explain the benefits of international tourism. It will be contributing to the development of local people. Today ecotourism is one of the essential financial sources for each country. This would not only create job opportunities but also boost the local economy. Some countries in the world have not any natural source to make money, but their use of tourist facility in achieving this aim. A good illustration of this is Brazil. Additionally, the government must provide information about the traditions and culture for foreign visitors through different media, Such as roadside billboards and advertisements.
In conclusion, although international visitors have a negative effect on the traditions and customs of each county, the authorities can provide the infrastructure which changes this position. This negative attitude by highlighting the advantages of foreign visitors to their countrymen and get acquaintance tourists to the native way of living.
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of the society. Others, however, believe that the school is the best place to learn this. Discuss both views and give own opinion. 56
- Today online shopping is growing what are the effects of this trend on the environment and type of the job? 89
- z 67
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their countries. What are the reasons for this? What can be done to change this negative attitude towards international tourism? 78
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 193, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the culture of the destination. However, can be reversed, with strategic steps by...
^^
Line 9, column 76, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...f global tourists can be reduced by the governments awareness campaigns to explain the bene...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1726.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.77257525084 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30745958235 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591973244147 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.0953219328 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.8421052632 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7368421053 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.31578947368 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286216640272 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0784647443666 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469192287871 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170151993053 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326318188432 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.89 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.