Some citizens believe that too much oversea tourists may cause some problems. The purpose for these assay is to discuss the possible reasons for this issue and I will give some proportional steps that the government could take.
There are some reasons for why local people think visitors form other countries could take some disadvantages, such as damaging the tourist site or overcrowded the transportation. Some residents argue that tourist would destroy significant tourist site, such as historical building. As a result, the government should spend too much taxes that local people pay for to fix these buildings or protect these places. In addition, too much visitors would also have some negative impacts on our public transportation and cause public transport overcrowding. There fore, some residents who communicate via bus or the MRT would claim that visitors may bring some harmful effects.
However, the viewpoints from these people could be reversed, while some measures are taken to solve the problems. One measure that the government can try is to increase the entrance fees, especially for these oversea tourists. The government could use this income for replace these places that are damaged by visitors. Another step could be taken is that government should increase the frequency of public transport, especially in rush hour. It could help communicators much easier to and from the workplace and would not be disturb by oversea tourists.
In conclusion, it is true that international visitors could cause some drawbacks and some resident would reluctant to this situation. Therefore, some measures should be taken by the government is important to reduced the harmful effects and change these resident’s perspective.
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 61
- Many people believe that international tourism has negative implications on their countries What is the reason for it What can be done to change the negative attitude towards international tourism 43
- The graphs below show the percentage of household energy used and the amount of greenhouse gases produced in Australia Summarise the information making comparisons where relevant 52
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The graphs below show the percentage of household energy used and the amount of greenhouse gases produced in Australia. Summarise the information making comparisons where relevant. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 329, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...result, the government should spend too much taxes that local people pay for to fix ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 431, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
... protect these places. In addition, too much visitors would also have some negative ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 553, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: Therefore
...nd cause public transport overcrowding. There fore, some residents who communicate via bus...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, therefore, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 41.998997996 40% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1479.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4375 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8404036787 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533088235294 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.0156073731 49.4020404114 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.642857143 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4285714286 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0925150150318 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.037610204124 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0198640889058 0.0667982634062 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.063013279944 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00379145755439 0.056905535591 7% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.