People have different views about who should teach children how to be good members of society. From my perspective, parents play a more important role in children’s moral education than school.
Many people believe that school should be responsible for education, including teaching children to become a moral people, or even to teach them how to communicate to others. However, in Taiwanese education, people believe that children who have good performance on their course should also become good members of society. So, Taiwanese teachers don’t teach children how to be good members or how to communicate with each others. Instead, they only teach children how to count and how to write when children entry school. Personally, I think school should be a part of teaching children to be moral members, but in Taiwan, teachers are more focus on teaching something else.
On the other hand, parents should be more important for teaching children how to be good members because they are the people who take care their own children for almost whole life after babies born. Before children entry school and after they leave school, parents are still the people who can teach them. I think parents have more effects to children than school and they should be responsible to teach children to be moral people.
In conclusion, it seems to me that parents should teach children how to be good members of society because of their effects on their children for a long time.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 89
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages? 56
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 85
- The charts below show the percentage water used for different purposed in six areas of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, i think, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1240.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 245.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0612244898 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55310608617 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 176.041082164 60% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.432653061224 0.561755894193 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 362.7 506.74238477 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7560524111 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.727272727 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2727272727 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.435742855146 0.244688304435 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.221933181282 0.084324248473 263% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644049735573 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.307653659107 0.151304729494 203% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619241174444 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.85 8.58950901804 80% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 78.4519038076 42% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.