The table compares the number of guest who went to Ashdown Museum, while the pie charts give information about visitor satisfaction form results of surveys in the year before and after the museum was redecorated. Overall, total number of guests increased and the proportion of guests rating the services as “very satisfied” or “satisfied” also went up after it was renewed.
In more detail, only 74,000 people visited the museum in the year before refurbished. According to the surveys, 40% of visitors rated services as “dissatisfied”. The proportion of people felt “satisfied” cam...
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages? 56
- Many people believe that international tourism has negative implications on their countries What is the reason for it What can be done to change the negative attitude towards international tourism 43
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 85
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit during the same two periods 68
- Many people believe that international tourism has negative implications on their countries. What is the reason for it? What can be done to change the negative attitude towards international tourism? 56
Below table graph depict the
Below table graph depict the amount of visitors who went to Ashdown Museum in the year before and after its refurbishment. The following two pie pictures illustrate the satisfaction proportion of visitors who accepted surveys during the same two periods.
According to the table chart, during the year before refurbishment, there were 74000 people visiting this Museum, while the number increased to 92000 after refurbishment.
Regarding to the two pie graphs, first of all, the satisfaction degree of visitors rose from the previous 30% to 40% now. In contrast, dissatisfied visitors rate dropped to only 15% comparing to 40% which is the data onto the year before refurbishment. Similarly, very satisfied visitors proportion rose 20 percentage points to 35%, consequently very dissatisfied degree fell to 5% from the previous 10%. Moreover, rate of visitors who didn’t attend surveys was constant 5%.
In conclusion, after refurbishment, visitors number is increasing, also the proportion of visitors who were satisfied or very satisfied was rising dramatically, whereas dissatisfaction rate or very dissatisfaction rate was falling.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, moreover, so, still, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1185.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.86633663366 4.92477711251 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 4.37715874451 2.65546596893 165% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490099009901 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 353.7 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.1917137985 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.727272727 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3636363636 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.09090909091 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196573622113 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111702094576 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.081972731983 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172739927273 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0442202865437 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 61.2550243902 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 11.4140731707 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.