Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled by governments rather than private companies. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In the context that science has become one of the top-tier concerns of each nation, a school of thought holds that scientific projects should be conducted and governed by national institutions rather than private organizations. From my perspective, I concur with this assertion as two main reasons related to budget and impacts on society will be elaborated on in this essay.
To commence with, scientific exploration should be assigned to national institutions as they outweigh private firms in terms of financial budget. Resting on stable tax income, governments can invest in high-costing scientific studies while private enterprises may suffer from financial burdens. To illustrate, executing space research not only involves a huge amount of money to invest in from facilities and equipment to training astronauts but also lasts several years and is likely to have uncertain results. Therefore, if private companies take responsibility for research activities, they may suffer from bankruptcy when such projects fail. In contrast, regulatory organizations can cover this loss with a national budget.
In addition, other aspects worth mentioning are the safety and welfare of citizens to prove that scientific studies should undergo vigorous administration by national authorities instead of private enterprises. First and foremost, with the community-oriented mission, no one but governments always prioritize their citizens’ safety so scientific research is controlled quality and facilities strictly. For instance, authorities spend more money on high-standard infrastructures to minimize risks in nuclear experiments that can cause radiation leaks and affect detrimentally human health through many generations. Meanwhile, private corporations may ignore these problems, to cut down costs. Secondly, scientific achievements should serve a public purpose while private companies use them for commercial interests. For example, medicines and other medical research should be carried out by authorities so that they become more accessible to all residents instead of only the rich can buy them from businesses.
In conclusion, it has been argued that governments should be responsible for scientific research and I side with this opinion as this facilitates certainty in investment cost and prevents side-effects regarding safety and social benefit.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-11-18 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
2023-11-15 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
2023-11-15 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
2023-11-08 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
2023-11-08 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
- The graph below shows the average daily sales of selected food items at the Brisk Caf by season Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- In many countries children are becoming overweight and unhealthy Some people think that the government should have the responsibility To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The best way to solve the world s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The best way for a country to prepare for the future is to invest more resources in the young people Do you agree or disagree 89
- In some countries people are having children at later age in life What are the reasons Do the advantage outweigh disadvantages 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2023.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.89795918367 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22008989189 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606413994169 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 616.5 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6822836655 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.5 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2857142857 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243174684795 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0805254322833 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501564402457 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144230102869 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0298393030284 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.24 12.4159519038 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.