Many people feel it is a waste of money to try to save endangered animal species, for example the tiger or the blue whale. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience. Write at least 250 words.
Several people believe that spending budget on preserving endangered animals like the tiger and whale is a waste of money. In my opinion, financial support of rare species leads to an effective step in the right direction.
It is my view that allocating a great size of money to keep endangered animals brings about preventing from adverse effect on the environment and nature. Since ecosystem plays a vital role in human life, the government should do everything in its power to raise public awareness regarding importance of the environment and rare species. In addition, from an environmental point of view, creatures have huge positive impacts on our life. It is undeniable fact that maintaining different species promotes biodiversity in planet.
In contrast, some individuals claim that money could be spend on people’s basic need instead of saving the tiger, for instance. They firmly instead that human life is of greater value than animal life and most people suffer from serious problem for example disease or cancer and they are more likely to lost their life rather than scares animals. Thus, they do not find paying attention to animals reasonable. I am not convinced by this argument as animals preservation result in improvement of food chains. I, personally, know of a few friends who are eco-warrior and concerned about the extinction. The have donated large proportions of money in order to save animals at risk.
In conclusion, I completely disagree with those who maintain that dedicating budget to save animals in danger is a waste of money because ecosystem, food chain and biodiversity benefit from endangered species.
- The chart below shows the percentage of people accessing news via different media in one country in 2013 2015 and 2017 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words
- These days it is much easier for many people to travel to different countries for tourism than in the past Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Many people nowadays spend a large part of their free time using a smartphone What do you think are the reasons for this Do you think this is a positive or negative development 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of people accessing news via different media in one country in 2013 2015 and 2017 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words
- People who start a university course but do not complete it should be fined Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience Write at least 250 words 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 546, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...s. I, personally, know of a few friends who are eco-warrior and concerned about the ext...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, thus, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1389.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22180451128 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83465876137 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639097744361 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.481802845 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.846153846 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4615384615 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.15384615385 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232495083079 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726926879714 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0554358392977 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136148239678 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382300100871 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.