There are different views on providing higher education in universities. Some people believe merely young individuals who own the best marks in their previous academic paths would have the opportunity to further their universities' learning processes. In contrast, others reckon higher education should be offered for all age groups lacking high school performance. This essay will examine both opinions, although I am of the opinion that higher education is beneficial for all ages, and the more motivated student should have more chances of admission.
On the one hand, there is no doubt that not everyone would like to attend higher education due to several rationales. By illustration, they do prefer to run their own business or enter the workplace after college. There are several talented and gifted students who are enthusiastic about knowledge and science and wish to have the chance to study in the reputation and high-quality universities. Undeniably, if students illustrate more motivation in higher education by their outstanding results, they have to support and have the right to be admitted to high-level and renowned universities. Meanwhile, universities can be the place and environment for these sorts of educators and researchers.
On the other hand, what mentioned above does not mean that there isn't any room for who is not young anymore or doesn't own a high level of grades in their previous academic route but is fond of learning. The more people be taught, especially in the universities' atmosphere, that education becomes more specific and in-depth, the better and more wise society will form. So, having the right and authority to be accepted in the universities should be communal, independent of restrictions, such as age-limitation or high-grade proficiency. While I believe in order to have the balance and concluding optimal and better results, admission in top-ranked universities should be competitive and based on qualification and eligibility.
To sum up, although people have separate views on the right to higher education in terms of age and performance. From my perspective, universities can be the host for any motivated person, but acceptance in top universities should be based on better qualifications.
- Issue Type College students should be encouraged to pursue subjects that interest them rather than the courses that seem most likely to lead to jobs
- More and more people are eating healthy food and exercising regularly What are the reasons for that What can we do to make other people do the same 84
- Companies pay salespeople according to how much they sell to customers Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages both to salespeople and customers 67
- Some people believe that certain old buildings should be preserved more than others What types of old buildings should be preserved Do you think the advantages of preserving old buildings outweigh the disadvantages 89
- In some cities there are few controls on the design and construction of homes and other buildings and owners can decide on the style of their houses Do the advantages of this outweigh the drawbacks 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 66, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...entioned above does not mean that there isnt any room for who is not young anymore o...
^^^^
Line 3, column 112, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ny room for who is not young anymore or doesnt own a high level of grades in their pre...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 248, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'universities'' or 'university's'?
Suggestion: universities'; university's
...ore people be taught, especially in the universities atmosphere, that education becomes more...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uld be based on better qualifications.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, thus, while, in contrast, no doubt, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1899.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39488636364 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13803968515 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525568181818 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 613.8 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0574665019 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.6 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4666666667 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73333333333 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174375660953 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0631589915886 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0363069588883 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121367785127 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402159205186 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.