Many people think that mobile phones should be banned in public places such as libraries shops and public transport Do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Many people think that mobile phones should be banned in public places such as libraries, shops and public transport. Do you agree or disagree?

Whether cellphones should be banned in public places has always been in the center of discussions. Some people welcome cellphones, arguing cellphones are quite an aid for them while others concern the rings and buzzes of phones leave those public places unbearable. From my perspective, cellphones should be allowed in public sites.

Firstly, mobile phones has become part of people’s life which are too integrated to decouple them from people even in public places. Mobile phones nowadays functions quite crucially in every aspect of people’s lives. They work as a connection between people and their jobs, friends and families. If people are denied the freedom to employ their phones in such public places as museums, libraries or the like, they might miss some important information. Information is important. Examples abound, including a businessman have to be in tune with changes of market always and Missing out a piece of information might cost him to lose a chance to promote a deal which ends up quite a fortune. Therefore, it is not feasible to require people to divorce from their phones even in public places.

Secondly, mobile phones could be set to be mute in order to keep quietness of those public places. It is understandable that some people have the concerns that a phone disrupts the great atmosphere of a public place. For example, the sudden rings or buzzes of a phone ruin a mood to appreciate a film in a theatre or the attentions to crack a math problem in a library. However, a cure to what afflict those people is not to ban cellphone. Instead, concerns can be easily solved by public places setting strict rules. Rules include every electronic devices should be muted or a talk on the phone should be conducted in some certain regions of a public place. When a cellphone is muted, it is still functioning.Therefore people could still feel connected to the world and would not miss any information.

In conclusion, it is not practical to prohibit cellphones in all public places. Some strategies can be applied to mitigate people’s concern about the inconvenience that cellphones might cause to them.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-10-23 WXY8888 73 view
2023-10-23 WXY8888 73 view
2023-10-23 WXY8888 73 view
2021-06-20 chathurika2008@gmail.com 61 view
2021-05-17 husan shergill 89 view
Essays by user WXY8888 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Whether cellphones should be banned in public p...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 711, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Therefore
...phone is muted, it is still functioning.Therefore people could still feel connected to th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 711, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...phone is muted, it is still functioning.Therefore people could still feel connected to th...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1787.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0056022409 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85294083269 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518207282913 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 556.2 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6103260865 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0526315789 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7894736842 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36842105263 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372908481576 0.244688304435 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126179840311 0.084324248473 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0790552148334 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23208609024 0.151304729494 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0780899986384 0.056905535591 137% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Whether cellphones should be banned in public p...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 711, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Therefore
...phone is muted, it is still functioning.Therefore people could still feel connected to th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 711, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...phone is muted, it is still functioning.Therefore people could still feel connected to th...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1787.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0056022409 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85294083269 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518207282913 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 556.2 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6103260865 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0526315789 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7894736842 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36842105263 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372908481576 0.244688304435 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126179840311 0.084324248473 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0790552148334 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23208609024 0.151304729494 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0780899986384 0.056905535591 137% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.