Many people think that some individuals are naturally good leader. Others think that people can learn leadership skills. Discuss both views.
Since leadership is an essential quality to become successful, there are many debatable arguments related to whether this quality only belongs to the gifted or individuals who can learn it. In my opinion, while many people are indeed born to have this quality, others can also turn themselves into good leaders through skills.
Being a talented leader requires some skills that are hard to achieve through practices or training. To be more specific, having a strong voice that can convince and inspire audiences is a gift that not everyone can possess, however, can attract people’s attention. A good appearance is also an aspect that can not be compensated by learnings, but a bonus point when a person wants to get good impressions. Because of that, people being fortunate to have these gifted are more likely to become leaders. For instance, Alexander the Great is documented to have a great voice that can inspire his soldiers when coming to war. Besides that, being a good looking man helps him easily to negotiate with his counterparts and alliances.
However, these aforementioned attractions would gradually fade out, because good leadership demands more experience and skills to handle humans and resources which only can be got from learning. To begin with, the experience is essential for leaders to deliver orders quickly and reliably, therefore, it requires leaders to learn and be involved in various difficulties to get that. Besides, people can learn body language through practices to make themselves confident, which helps to gain trust from followers. Therefore, by learning these skills, people can turn themselves to be good leaders without being gifted. As an example of a self-training leader, my father has practiced many times before any presentations and gone through a lot of adversities to get lessons and knowledge. Finally, he becomes the executive director of an international company.
In conclusion, despite many natural leaders who are gifted to have qualities that are unlikely to be possessed by the majority of people, ordinary people can also make themselves talented leaders through learning skills.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-15 | Flora_30 | 56 | view |
| 2021-08-05 | adaline0111 | 67 | view |
| 2021-07-23 | bikram12 | 56 | view |
| 2021-07-15 | karan2030 | 56 | view |
| 2021-07-03 | sandeep_kumarr | 56 | view |
- Many people today prefer to try another country s food instead of local food Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages for the environment and economy 73
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled tea and pineapples in 2010 and 2015 in five European countries Fairtrade a category of products for which farmers from developing countries have been paid an officially agreed fair price 73
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything thay want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- Two charts below show the percentage of qualified graduates in a particular country Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some people think that in order to solve traffic and transportation problems people should be encouraged to live in cities rather than in suburbs or in the countryside To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 410, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to body'
Suggestion: to body
... to get that. Besides, people can learn body language through practices to make them...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, however, if, look, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1805.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29325513196 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83214626221 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542521994135 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2971498908 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.333333333 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7333333333 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46666666667 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283323819615 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100350269528 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617386287452 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197136803744 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0278152197488 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.