Being a good leader is challenging and requires certain skills. Some people believe that leadership skills are innate whereas others argue that it can be learned. This essay will discuss both views and explain why I believe leadership skills can be learned.
People with good leadership skills are considered to be waymakers. Some people believe that they were born with this ability because they it is evident in their behaviour from childhood. For instance, I have witnessed that many of my classmates who were monitors of my class are succesful entrepreneurs now which depicts their innate ability. Apart from this many leaders today are born in family where there are already established leaders. For example, Rahul Gandhi, a prominent political figure, has a family tree with many famous politicians including Jawaharlal Nehru. This shows that there are people who are born-to-be leaders.
However, this is minority as majority of the people learn to be leaders. Many argue that people who are prowess leaders learn through their experience. This is similiar to my life experience. Even though I have been an introvert throughout my life I became a skillful team leader by facing challenges and improving my inner ability day-by-day which is an affirmation that leadership skill can be learned. Other than this, an influential leader are mostly highly qualified people which shows that they learned their skill through education. One such persona is Gandhiji who used his professional skill as a lawyer to free India from British colonization. This depicts that leadership skill can be learned.
In conclusion, many people argue that some people are leaders due to their natural ability because either they are born in family with leaders or it is evident in their behaviour from childhood. In my opinion, leadership skill can be learned through experience and education.
- Many people think that some individuals are naturally good leader Others think that people can learn leadership skills Discuss both views 73
- You have seen an advertisement from a couple who live in Australia for someone to teach their two children your language for a year Write a letter to the couple In your letter 1 Explain why you think you would be suitable for the job 2 Say what else you c 75
- A museum near your home is looking for people to do part time voluntary work You would like to do voluntary work at the museum Write a letter to the museum director to apply for work In your letter 1 Explain what you want to do voluntary work at the museu 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 142, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'be'
Suggestion: be
... born with this ability because they it is evident in their behaviour from childho...
^^
Line 3, column 608, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...Nehru. This shows that there are people who are born-to-be leaders. However, this is...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 97, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...n to be leaders. Many argue that people who are prowess leaders learn through their exp...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, whereas, apart from, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 13.1623246493 228% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 7.30460921844 246% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 42.0 24.0651302605 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1585.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2657807309 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67549347996 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485049833887 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.5091256146 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.0555555556 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7222222222 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340082617145 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126590781876 0.084324248473 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0811289401059 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249202271814 0.151304729494 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0599164286681 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.