Many people think that some individuals are naturally good leader Others think that people can learn leadership skills Discuss both views

Recently, the question of playing sports has been brought to the public attention. Some people advocate positive aspects of sports while others criticize the risk of this field. From my perspective, taking part in any games can bring both benefits and drawbacks.

Obviously, playing sports is one of the most effective ways to maintain a healthy lifestyle. Players can improve their physical endurance as well as mental strength by either practicing or playing on a regular basis. Consequently, people who are involved in playing sports can have better performance at both work or study. In addition, with regard to some talented participants, playing sports normally paves the way for a professional career. It could probably because these classes provide them a specialized environment to reach their peak performances.

However, people have to admit that players still encounter too many risks while playing sports. To be more specific, due to hectic schedule or overloaded exercises, injured bodies will limit contestants’ ability and they have a slim chance of doing well. In some circumstances, some serious injuries can lead to death or permanent wounds. Furthermore, regarding some particular sport such as skiing, team members must pay bills for equipment or club fees, which are sometimes out of their budget.

In conclusion, joining in any sports brings both merits and disadvantages. If people want to lessen the negative impacts and make full use of practising sports, they have to plan a suitable scheme.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, however, if, regarding, so, still, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, with regard to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1292.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 240.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38333333333 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87999565972 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.7 0.561755894193 125% => OK
syllable_count: 379.8 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.8283185828 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.2857142857 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1428571429 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.85714285714 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150381610949 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0521471182049 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484418456406 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.094517190973 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0218344080172 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.