It is undeniable that today's man is a puppet of Technology. Therefore, nowadays people prefer to send messages to others rather than to conversate with each other. I will elaborate the root causes of this phenomenon as well as its loopholes which outweigh its pros in upcoming paragraphs.
To commence with the factors responsible for this, first and foremost hectic schedule is the prominent cause for this criteria. Everybody has heavy workload since the beginning of the day such as students in studies, adults in offices. As a result, famine of time even for family members.So, messages and chatting on mobile phone is the only source to contact with each other. Apart from this, human being is maniac to smartphones. For instance, a survey has shown in its report that youngsters cannot leave their mobile phone more than half an hour and get frustrated without their phone and do not like to talk others unless they get their phone back. Additionally, it is a time saving technique as well as sometimes people Express their feeling in form of texts because they are shy and feel hesitation in a face to face conversation.
Moving to the demerits of this trend that it mainly affects the bondings and relations of people. By virtue of, charts on mobile scanner stipulated sympathy when people are sad and in grief. Consequently, lack of love and affection for each other. Moreover people or more attached with the person's voice and their voice assist them to get relief from pain and text do not do this. Besides this, always texting on smartphones produces health issues like itching in eyes, headache and brain maladies. The reason is deleterious lights and waves emitted by it. To illustrate, according to scientific research rate of finger surgeries and weakness of hand bones escalated from past years and culprit of it is usage of mobile phone for text and mails.
To conclude from above confabulation, it is axiomatic that to save time it is convenient to send messages and chat however it is mandatory to talk with each other to save relationships and enhance love and affection.
- The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne. 11
- The table gives information about the average hours spent per week in front of the computer for Internet surfing playing games for business purposes by people of different age groups in China 68
- Many people today use their mobile phones for sending texts more than talking. What are the reasons for this? Are there more advantages than disadvantages? 84
- The diagram gives information about the process of making pulp and paper Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- Stress is now a major problem in many countries around the world. What are some of the factors in modern society that cause this stress, and how can we reduce it? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 114, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...tic schedule is the prominent cause for this criteria. Everybody has heavy workload ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 289, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: So
... famine of time even for family members.So, messages and chatting on mobile phone ...
^^
Line 5, column 60, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...its of this trend that it mainly affects the bondings and relations of people. By...
^^
Line 5, column 250, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...k of love and affection for each other. Moreover people or more attached with the person...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, first, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, apart from, for instance, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1747.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92112676056 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66299257574 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571830985915 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2595333267 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.764705882 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8823529412 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76470588235 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313748647068 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0792664556976 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606959403559 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158089321608 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101404232652 0.056905535591 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.