It is believed that males and female students at the university are likely to choose specific subjects to study because of their gender differences. For example, girls prefer to explore more art subjects such as languages or literature than their counterparts. This essay will discuss the main reasons for this practice and examine why such a tendency should be modified in details.
There are a couple of leading causes of this trend in college still. The most significant reason is the notion of binary division in gender: men and women fundamentally in every aspect of lives. Thus, this has also triggered a misleading stereotype in different specific subjects although every subject does not have the properties between feminine and masculine. Besides, although there is no evidence that men and women born with innate interests in various disciplines, many societies are inclined to force students to study some particular subjects in light of different genders while affected by influences of some cultures and customs.
However, this convention should be discouraged and altered immediately. Every human being has a right to educate themselves with their free will, so society needs to guarantee that regardless of genders, humans can have an equal opportunity to learn various subjects by considering their subject preferences. Aside from that, if many countries continue to accept this practice in the university, the social issue, gender inequality would be severe and to make matter worse, stereotyping and discrimination against gender might be exacerbated.
In conclusion, there are some distinctive reasons why still students tend to pursue studying particular subjects depending on their genders. However, as such a convention might lead to potential serious social problems such as gender inequality and deterring individuals' free will, consequently; it should disappear.
- The group below shows average carbon dioxide(CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 84
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for six areas of the world. 84
- The tables below give information about sales of fairtrade-labelled coffee and banana in 1999 and 2004 in five european countries. 67
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restuarnts between 2003 and 2013. 78
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not to go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008. Summarise the information. 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, consequently, however, if, so, still, thus, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1603.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56597222222 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92844636776 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607638888889 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.6150121498 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.583333333 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188679238049 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0719734850878 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0351718572297 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11732035916 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451629015056 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.98 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.