Many students find it difficult to concentrate or pay attention at school. What are the reasons? What could be done to solve this problem?
In recent years, limited concentration among students at schools has never failed to draw public attention and spark controversies. In this essay, the reasons behind this phenomenon will be discussed, along with potential solutions to it.
There are two elements that contribute to limited concentration of children. The first one is prevalence of noise distractions, such as irritating noise from construction sites, vehicles horns honking, or cars rushing by, which surround children. These inappropriate sounds inadvertently disturb children’s learning environment by engaging in their curiosity. This is due to the fact that schools and tuition buildings have neglected to provide qualified studying environments for students. As a result, children may struggle with paying attention in classrooms.
Furthermore, another reason that should be taken into account is shortage of encouragement and recognition provided by teachers in overcrowded classrooms. This is exemplified by feelings of being neglected and disengaged from lessons if children are not consistently recognized or praised. Teacher may find it difficult to give individual attention to each student when classes are lage, which can lead to a lack of studying motivation and interest among students.
Two solutions of great practicality are suggested to alleviate the situation. To begin with, schools and tuition buildings should take proactive actions on creating effective and appropriate learning environments. To be more specific, sound insulation materials must be used for classrooms, such as sound reducing-glass or soundproof walls, which can help prevent outside noise and provide students with a quiet environment to study. Teachers’ observation in classes can also be conducted as a way to combat the problem. In particular, teachers should improve their observation skills in order to identify students who needs encouragement or attention. The more recognition and attention teachers provide, the more eagerly students will participate in classroom activities.
In conclusion, prevalence of noise distractions and teachers’ recognition in overcrowded classrooms are the main reasons that account for the problem. Along with solutions mentioned above, there are a number of ways that could be done to counteract this problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-04 | hien3112 | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | ngo viet | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-19 | Nguyen Hai Dang | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | ngango56 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | Anne020304 | 89 | view |
- The maps below show the layouts of the nature Museum between 2010 and 2013 67
- The bar chart shows the information of the number of volunteers and paid workers in 4 different roles in the sports sector of an Australian town in 2015 67
- The maps below show the layouts of the nature Museum between 2010 and 2013 67
- Studies have suggested that children watch much more television than they did in the past and spend less time on active or creative things What are the reasons and what measures should be taken to encourage children to spend more time on active or creativ 73
- Many students find it difficult to concentrate or pay attention at school What are the reasons What could be done to solve this problem 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, so, in conclusion, in particular, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.3376753507 288% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1983.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.88427299703 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.41164227005 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575667655786 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9144787563 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.647058824 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8235294118 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41176470588 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242474996961 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0713798377564 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531549655192 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161562818797 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447562546164 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.82 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.