In this day and age, it is undeniable that both supermarkets and grocery stores are welcoming customers to buy international products instead of local ones. This dilemma has brought to public attraction with many reasons and viewpoints. As far as I am concerned, the positive side of this trend surpassed the opposite, so, this essay will discuss causes as well as elaborate my own opinion.
There are severl reasons related to this phenomenon that has surveyed. To begin, this is primarily because of the shortage of local ingredients and sources of needs. Thus, if there is no imported food to sell, the economic background might completely decline dramatically. Next, we are now living in the intergration world, so, it is no obscure that countries exchange products with others. The more products have exported, the more improvement has supposed. Moreover, people intend to be more interest in other countries' results than local consequences. For instance, Vietnamses customers always find for products of USA or different developed regions to acheive higher quality. So, it is significant and imperative for sellers to claim more global products in order to attract residents.
It is clear to see no negative respondents in this trend. First and foremost, we all believe that the commercial world is thriving to get more profit and provide healthy goods for their purchasers. Hence, this is why more Europe or Austrailia products now being sold by family markets in Asia. In addition, to impress and advertise buyers, sellers also use a trick by naming to places of production, and a prestigious country such as Italy is one of them. Nevertheless, this hack depicts a vital growth in marketing and, it has recorded more entrepreneurs started to do the same. If it brings merits for both sellers and beneficiaries, there is lack of evidence to stop this trend.
To conclude, although there are many who claim that respecting local goods is much more better, my perspective goes with the former. Having mentioned above, I strongly believe that our life will become more various with plenty of sources.
- As water is a valuable resource governments all over the world should control how much water their citizens use To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 87
- The table shows the number of mobile phones and personal computers per 1000 people in 2003 in 6 different counties Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The illustrations below show how chocolate is produced 11
- Full time university students spend most of the time in studying They should do other activities too To what extent do you agree or disagree 82
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 335, Rule ID: IT_IS_NO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'not' or 'now'?
Suggestion: not; now
...ng in the intergration world, so, it is no obscure that countries exchange product...
^^
Line 7, column 84, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
...aim that respecting local goods is much more better, my perspective goes with the former. H...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, thus, well, for instance, in addition, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1769.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12753623188 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85140793296 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597101449275 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 5.43587174349 258% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.3351065526 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.1052631579 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1578947368 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78947368421 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.455570084242 0.244688304435 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115005372682 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0413352101826 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23143700071 0.151304729494 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0956748275635 0.056905535591 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.