In many workplaces, online communication is getting more common than meeting face to face. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
Communication via internet is becoming more popular in modern life. Employees is choosing online communication in many workplaces, rather that meeting face to face. Although it can be beneficial and time saving working online, I think, there is small cons that should be taken in concederation.
There are two major positive sides on line working. Firstly, it can be save ones spending. It is obvious that travel to the requires certain amount of budget: fee for bus ticket or pay for taxi, if there is a distance between workplayes and worker, and money for having a luch or dinner. Therefore, those who works via internet should not worry about these expenditures. Secondly, working online is timing saving. For example, that time which a employee should had spent on go to and from work, would not have been spent, exept in that time the employee can have a relax. Taking into account these views, I believe, working remotely via internet has more the advantages.
On the contrary, there are small parts which should be thought. Online working means, a worker need a good internet connection to interract with other colleges. If there is and internet outage while communication, it can delay a working process. Furthermore, those who works in multinational companies may suffer fron a different time zone. For example, those who wrok from Japan may not be work with those who connected from the USA. Indeed, these factors might not be bring a serious outcome, especially in developed or under developed countries, but it can cause discomfort from those who work remotely via internet from countrysides.
To sum up, although working via internet can have small cons, I think due to spending and time saving, the advantages outweight the disadvantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-27 | raspreet singh | 78 | view |
| 2020-12-08 | Bhimani Nick | 63 | view |
| 2021-02-02 | xuanhieu26 | 73 | view |
| 2020-10-11 | Qurat ul ain | 41 | view |
- The pie charts below describe about the average of household expensitures in A country in 1950 and 2010 11
- In many workplaces online communication is getting more common than meeting face to face Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 61
Comments
Start Targeting the mission…
Start Targeting the mission and take down your opponent. To be able to win in a game where you have a lot of dangerous players stick merge, you need to have the skills of a professional marksman. In the most popular gunfight game - stick merge
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 237, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are small cons'?
Suggestion: there are small cons
...nd time saving working online, I think, there is small cons that should be taken in concederation. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 77, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...n line working. Firstly, it can be save ones spending. It is obvious that travel to ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 444, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ng saving. For example, that time which a employee should had spent on go to and ...
^
Line 3, column 564, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...xept in that time the employee can have a relax. Taking into account these views, I bel...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, therefore, while, for example, i think, on the contrary, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1473.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07931034483 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76965251065 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565517241379 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.6049923235 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.6470588235 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0588235294 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.47058823529 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0881565869466 0.244688304435 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0386032899082 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0862583417866 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.07707582395 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0887620185666 0.056905535591 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.