In many workplaces online communication is getting more common than meeting face to face Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages

Recently, modes of communication are changing all around the world. Online communication is taking over the face to face meeting particularlly at workplaces. This eassy will discussed the disadvantages of online communications outweights the advantages.
Online communication in work places is becoming part of regular routiene, however; people prefer virtual communication due to its convinience and time saving. Employeers dont have to be present in person in order to complete their task related communication, which results in saving time. For example, a recent studies shows that percentage of worker who communicate online are able to finish their work on time than those who communicate physically. Overall, online communication is making life easy and allowing people to save time in order to complete their tasks at work place.
Major draw backs of online communication are less effective and impact team work. However, online communication fails to show the body language of the person which results in creating friction between co workers. For example, managers in USA prefer to communicate in person at workplace because it helps in team building and create more productive results. All in all, online cmmunication is developing more distance between employeers which affects the overall performance of the task.
To recapitulate, online communication is increasing with time at work place. This eassy disccuss the advantages of convinience and time saving along with the disadvantages of less effctiveness and low team work. In my opinion, online communication at work place has more cons than pros, it will take more time to become more advantageous for work environment.

Votes
Average: 4.1 (3 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 175, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'discuss'
Suggestion: discuss
...cularlly at workplaces. This eassy will discussed the disadvantages of online communicati...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 170, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...convinience and time saving. Employeers dont have to be present in person in order t...
^^^^
Line 2, column 311, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'study'?
Suggestion: study
...s in saving time. For example, a recent studies shows that percentage of worker who com...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, for example, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1432.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52895752896 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1737028997 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544401544402 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.218675804 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.285714286 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.07142857143 7.06120827912 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271083316282 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106163111657 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724978743911 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186452321799 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0782454413535 0.056905535591 138% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 175, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'discuss'
Suggestion: discuss
...cularlly at workplaces. This eassy will discussed the disadvantages of online communicati...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 170, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...convinience and time saving. Employeers dont have to be present in person in order t...
^^^^
Line 2, column 311, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'study'?
Suggestion: study
...s in saving time. For example, a recent studies shows that percentage of worker who com...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, for example, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1432.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52895752896 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1737028997 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544401544402 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.218675804 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.285714286 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.07142857143 7.06120827912 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271083316282 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106163111657 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724978743911 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186452321799 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0782454413535 0.056905535591 138% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.