Many young people today know more about international pop and movie stars than famous people in the history of their country.
Why is this case?
What can be done to increase young people’s interest in their country’s history?
It is obvious that many youngsters now interested in pop and movie stars all over the world rather than prominent historical figures of their own country. This essay will analyze the reason why this is happening and also suggests some measures to encourage the youth to gain more knowledge about the history of their country
Since music and movies from other countries are easily accessible to youngsters who have Internet connection, they tend to be appealed to the diverse cultures and be curious about the real wealthy life of those famous stars behind the scenes. As a result, those celebrities somehow become idols of millions of the young in terms of field of art or lifestyle. In addition, the Internet might accountable for giving wings to the spread of fame, making those stars appear ubiquitously. Moreover, youngsters currently exposure too much on mass media instead of focusing on studying at school. They are taught to get good grades and pass the exams rather than obtain the real knowledge from any subjects. This makes history education prone to inattention, meaning that they are less likely to aware of heros or legend figures in their country’s history.
There are, however, some noticeable solutions to tackle this condition. First, school trips should attach to history lessons to great value to promote learning and memory all the events and renowned historical figures. For example, students could be looked to visit museums and historical sites to have a good grasp of their country’s history with a general view about events and characters. As a result, they are less likely to be bored with a page of history. Second, the combine between entertaining and educational movies would probably make students more stick easily. For instance, film-makers could shoot the film related to history to propaganda more about the former country at war and how the historical heroes have made it more beautifully so far. While watching it, youngsters are able to imagine and remember spontaneously.
In conclusion, the young’s awareness of global celebrities currently are much more than that of renowned historical characters due to the mass media and the uninterested history subject. Nevertheless, this condition has been solved by school trips to the museums and educational movies as well.
- Despite a large number of gyms a sedentary lifestyle is gaining popularity in the contemporary world What problems are associated with this What solutions can you suggest Please help me to check this essay Thanks a lot 67
- Many young people today know more about international pop and movie stars than famous people in the history of their country Why is this case What can be done to increase young people s interest in their country s history 78
- Some people say that news has no connection with almost people s lives and it is a waste of time for most of us to read newspapers and watch TV news Do you agree and disagree Pls help me to check this essay Thanks a lot 73
- Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will be no longer necessary because people can see historical objects and works of art by using a computer Do you agree or disagree 84
- the pie charts and table gives information about the total value and sources of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1952.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 374.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2192513369 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70947849218 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569518716578 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 607.5 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.0076885104 49.4020404114 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.375 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.1875 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282545796968 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746126993129 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0675246889136 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179171276058 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0592480192225 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.78957915832 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.