Many young people who leave school hold a negative attitude towards learning. Why does this happen? What are the solutions?
The critical thoughts of school leavers in learning remains a source of controversy in the field of education. While this situation is ascribed to several factors, there are some measures to give students a positive way to think about studying after graduating.
There are two significant reasons as to why youngsters have a low opinion of learning as they stop learning at school. Firstly, schools may fail to provide students with working experience and skills which are their future employers often seek for. A clear explanation is that the school curriculum in many education systems may include many unnecessary subjects that do not provide any benefits for their jobs prospects and career progression in the future. Secondly, teaching methodology may be old-fashioned and uninteresting, such as teacher-led lessons, rote-learning. Students, as consequence, have the less motivation to study at school, which may lead to the lower academic results.
Some resolutions could be implemented to change the negative way that graduates think about learning at school. The first measure is that schools should teach students important working skills, including communication, teamwork, and leadership by sending them to workplaces to earn some working experience as a compulsory part of the course. For example, the schools which train in the field of Mining and Geology may corporate with the Mining enterprises to organize field trips to give students the opportunity to study in a real environment. The other measure is that schools should introduce modern teaching methods and apply cutting-edge technology in teaching to attract learners' attention. Interacting learning, student-centered learning or the addition of visual aids in lessons are the greatest methods to enhance students’ feeling about the lessons and subjects.
In conclusion, some factors are conducive to the critical thinking of students after leaving schools, such as the scarcity of working skills in lessons or backward teaching methods. To address this situation, there are some effective resolutions, including the supplement actual elective courses in the school curriculum and combining the latest methodology and advanced technology in teaching.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-21 | truognchinh | 73 | view |
| 2018-11-18 | truognchinh | 73 | view |
- It is better for college students to live in school than to live at home with their parents Do you agree or disagree 72
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities. 61
- The best way to solve the world’s environmental problems is increasing the cost of fuel. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego, California and the rest of the world. 67
- 20.Some people think that environmental problems are too big for individuals to solve. Other believe individuals can also do somethings to solve these problems. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 666, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'attracting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'teach' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: attracting
...ply cutting-edge technology in teaching to attract learners attention. Interacting learnin...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1898.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64880952381 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07773784428 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547619047619 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.639610263 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.571428571 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115936352053 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0414899476235 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0180947082609 0.0667982634062 27% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0695600087189 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0181922947601 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.