Many young people who leave school hold a negative attitude towards learning. Why does this happen? What are the solutions?
Owning a negative attitude about learning is considered to be common in a large number of the young who left school. This trend is caused by several main factors, and some measures should be taken to address this issue.
To begin with, there are some reasons why young people keep their negatives to learning when leaving school. The first cause is that young learners are forced to study too many theoretical subjects which they are not interested in, and that knowledge might not be applied in their real-life later. Therefore, they often consider that it is not useful and essential to learn too much at school. Furthermore, parents tend to put the high pressure of educational outcomes on their youngsters. In fact, in order to get higher academic performance than other peers, parents usually require their offspring to attend extra classes after school time. As a result, this makes them feel exhausted and stressful when it comes to learning.
However, this problem might be tackled by several solutions. Firstly, theoretical subjects should be reduced so that more soft skills might be taught in the principal curriculum. For example, young people should be educated in more classes related to communication and problem-solving skills, which enhances their confidence when entering real life. Hence, this method causes these young people to make more concentration on their learning. Secondly, instead of enforcing young people to get high scores in all subjects, parents should encourage them to allocate more time and efforts to the subjects they have a deep passion to maximize their potential. As a result, learning is likely to become more interesting and useful to young learners.
In conclusion, there are some primary reasons leading to the fact that many young people tend to hold a negative attitude towards learning after leaving school. However, this problem might be solved by practical approaches suggested above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-02 | ngocminhho | 56 | view |
| 2024-12-02 | ngocminhho | 56 | view |
| 2024-12-02 | ngocminhho | 56 | view |
| 2024-12-02 | ngocminhho | 56 | view |
| 2024-12-02 | ngocminhho | 56 | view |
- Long distance flight uses more fuel than cars and brings pollution to the environment. We should discourage non-essential flight rather than limit the use of cars. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
- Some people believe the government should spend money building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion Others however think that building more and wider roads is a better way to reduce traffic congestion Discuss both views and give your opinio 78
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their time. Do the advantages of this outweigh disadvantages? 67
- Long distance flight uses more fuel than cars and brings pollution to the environment. We should discourage non-essential flight rather than limit the use of cars. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- The maps show the changes of Shalton village from 1910 and 2010. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 73, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... learning is considered to be common in a large number of the young who left school. This trend i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1628.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2347266881 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63696570998 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556270096463 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4178894306 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.75 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4375 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0625 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284935602816 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100884116894 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110403955872 0.0667982634062 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211131138654 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0858157815282 0.056905535591 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.