The media pay too much attention to the lives and relationships of celebrities such as actors, singers or footballers. They should spend more time reporting the lives of ordinary people instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
These days, there have been controversies about the issue of whether media should pay attention to manifest normal resident's life rather than consider famous people's lifestyles a target to show interest in. From my perspective, I partly agree with the statement above.
On the one hand, it is undoubtedly true that reporting a well-known figure's way of live always attracts readers' notice. Exaggeratedly, every single one of us may have wondered at least once in a lifetime how do renowned people's lives differ from normal inhabitant's lives. As a result, by showing and publishing the articles which take superstars as the main topic, reporters and journalists will gain wuch considerable profit. Moreover, if celebrities perfrom adequate behaviours or doing socially-advantageous activites like volunteering or preserving the environment, they will be considered as a benchmark for everyone to admire and imitate. For example, the co-founder of Microsoft Bill Gates has donated an enormous amount of his fortune to his voluntary association on a regular basis. Therefore, newspaper and articles about him are essentially required.
On the other hand, in some cases, social media should not exceedingly concentrate on famous figures. If some abnormal or unacceptable actions are announced from famous people, they can undeniably have effect on readers to a certain degree, especially teenagers who may be vulnerable. Also, well-known people career wlll be indirectly collapsed by the articles with shocking headlines. Sometimes netizen's effect is too powerful that they will not allow the renowned figures to have a chance to mend their profession. Besides, ordinary citizens' good activities should also be taken into consideration as celebritiy news are not the only factor that dominates the newsfeed.
Generally, while extremely focusing on celebrities' lives, ordinary people's lives should also be taken into account by the media.
- The diagram below show the design for a wind turbine and its location Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows how much money a city council gave to book clubs over a four year period summarise the information by selecting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The table and bar chart show how journey times in a city centre changed after improvements were made to the transport network and the costs of using different forms of transport in the city Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main fea 67
- Some people say that you can learn more about another country by watching television programs and films about it than by actually visiting it How true is this statement Is there anything you can learn by watching programs and films about it Give reasons f 73
- The chart below gives information about the level of education of Bulgarian people who wanted to go and live in another country in 2002 2006 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevan 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 116, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'residents'' or 'resident's'?
Suggestion: residents'; resident's
...should pay attention to manifest normal residents life rather than consider famous people...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 85, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ia should not exceedingly concentrate on famous figures. If some abnormal or unac...
^^
Line 4, column 129, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lso be taken into account by the media.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, at least, for example, as a result, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56610169492 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10665344136 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.674576271186 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3685860556 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.285714286 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0714285714 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185797419334 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.055950896844 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482531937074 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121590011952 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430528751024 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.