The media should include more stories which report good news. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people think that the media should publish more good news. In my perspective, I partly agree with this point of view; but I believe that bad news is by no means unessential. The reasons for it are twofold.
On the one hand, good information brings a variety of advantages to audiences. Firstly, it strengthens public morale. In deeds, thanks to various of positive information relating to the country like sport, economy or intelligence, residents are more easy going with others and increase their belief in nation’s future. For example, witnessing Vietnamese football team wins the game in an international match, citizens in Hanoi are crying in happiness together, making the city become more friendly and lively. Secondly, hope of watcher is cultivated is another advantageous of good news. For instance, thanks to hearing that some effective treatments are successfully researched, cancer patients are more optimistic about their treating processes, which plays an integral part of winning disease.
On the other hand, I believe that there are some reasons why negative news is necessary in some ways. In other word, bad news may publish facts that are valuable for users. initially, regarding to Economy, headlines and details relating to crisis or bankrupcy of companies/organizations give inventors an easier access to promptly withdraw their investments. Additionally, in term of environment, let ‘s take Japan as a typical example, had it not been for being early informed some natural disasters such as typhoon or earthquake, Japanese would have never had careful preparation to cope with these events, reducing the consequence of damages. The last but not least, it would be a mistake if we don’t mention to society, some negative information about crimes equip readers the awareness of the surrounding dangers.
By the way of conclusion, why I accept that good news have positive impacts on audience, I reckon that bad news should be continued informing based on their irreplaceble benefits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | sepide1367 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | martinestefan | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | kiana | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | Niusha | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | lydunhien | 61 | view |
- The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US, EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010 78
- The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007 61
- Sicentific research should be carried out and controlled by the government rather than private companies. Do you agree or dissagree? 89
- A few languages are increasingly spoken in different countries while the usage of others is rapidly declining Is this a positive or a negative development 73
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 174, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Initially
...lish facts that are valuable for users. initially, regarding to Economy, headlines and de...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, for example, for instance, i reckon, such as, by the way, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1717.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38244514107 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07351704266 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623824451411 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.7619594823 49.4020404114 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.466666667 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2666666667 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147613823868 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.054814766228 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706242592525 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113479900053 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0666994428161 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.