A few languages are increasingly spoken in different countries, while the usage of others is rapidly declining. Is this a positive or a negative development?
It is true that some languages are widely being spoken in many nations as a result of globalization, but the opposite trend is witnessed for the rest. I believe that this phenomenon has both bright sides and drawbacks.
On the one hand, strengthening the use of some selected languages is beneficial in some ways. Firstly, it cultivates the understanding as well as eliminates mislead between different parts of the world. For example, mastering common languages like English or Spanish gives speakers with distinguished nationalities an easier assess to communicate more effeciently in global meetings. In addition, students or workers and in developing countries studying global languages to have favorable conditions in keeping up with updated documents published worldwide. Thanks for this, the gap between poor nations and healthy ones in term of a wide range of field such as education and technology are shortened.
On the other hand, it is my opinion that the reduction in using some languages has a variety of adverse impacts. Initially, the disappearance of some languages put the cultural diversification in jeopardy. Undeniably, language (both verbal and writen) is crucial part of culture. Failuring in remaining the mother toung is conducive to the detorioration in hesitate culture in some countries. Further and even more significantly, poor nations failing to catch up using common language are more and more isolated. Let ‘s take Taytung as a stark example, had it been for the policy of the goverment to encourage their resident to speak home language only, this nation is now in isolation part from the word.
In conclusion, few languages are gaining widely use while the others are witnessing considerable decline. This trend bring both advantages and disadvantages to nations concerned.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-05 | ctbx312 | 78 | view |
| 2022-12-12 | vishal sachdeva | 80 | view |
| 2022-11-02 | vishal sachdeva | 80 | view |
| 2022-08-04 | Albert Armin | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-17 | hnhung | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US, EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010 78
- The media should include more stories which report good news. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people believe that young people know about international pop and movie stars but know very less about famous people from the history in their own country. Why is this? How can more interest be created in young people to gain more knowledge about the 78
- The tradition that the family gets together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 118, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'brings'.
Suggestion: brings
...essing considerable decline. This trend bring both advantages and disadvantages to na...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, so, then, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1545.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42105263158 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08738833952 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4035531393 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1333333333 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177303325579 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0586504538605 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0374004261026 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116552556521 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352676510986 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.