Medical professionals such as doctors or nurses from poorer countries often migrate to richer countries to work What problems arise from this situation What measures can be taken to deal with it

There is an upward trend of medical professionals migrating to more affluent countries from poorer countries. This migration puts pressure on the healthcare system of the poorer countries and makes ensuring quality treatment hard. This problem can be tackled by providing better pay and better social security.

Poorer countries often have a substandard quality of living compared to richer countries. And it is obvious that they won't be able to match the incentives provided by the richer countries. So medical professionals often prefer moving to a developed country. This creates a void in the healthcare system, which resonates with other areas as well and, in turn, accounts for the lower standard of living. This loop is a massive barrier to creating a sound healthcare system. Again, in developed countries, there is a better social security system. Naturally, medical professionals think, living in a developed country is better for themselves and their future generations.

The primary solution to this problem is ensuring better pay. If the difference in salaries is low, more and more people would consider living in their native country, They also need to provide better facilities, for example, free education for them and their family, life insurance, etc., But these methods are expensive, especially for a developing country, And to allocate these funds, money might be taken from other important sectors like education, or law enforcement, So, countries might need to look for foreign donors or aid to adopt these policies,

In conclusion, poorer countries fail to ensure quality healthcare due to the migration of medical professionals to richer countries, which can be tackled by creating better opportunities for them in the native country.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 220, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...unities for them in the native country.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, well, for example, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1494.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41304347826 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86679158884 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54347826087 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 174.319689555 49.4020404114 353% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 124.5 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254679656987 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104275004283 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673432848798 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185410297083 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0768517584905 0.056905535591 135% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.