In today's male dominant world, women are mostly discriminated. Mostly only men are at high end posts. Some people argue that authorities should secure a percentage in these jobs for females. I am agree with the statement and I will discuss the reasons for that in this essay.
Firstly, gender inequality will significantly suffer if jobs are provided for women. Women can work at the same platform with males. Mostly employers hire males rather than females as they ate considered to be more stronger. Likewise it is believed that more work can be derived from men. Thus if officials secure some jobs for females they can get chance to prove themselves.
Secondly, this can increase the success rate. Hiring females at the work, at they were never before may led to develop more ideas. Moreover women are more patient than men. They can handle work require lot of time more easily. For example in cooking which require more focus and patient mostly women are expert.
To conclude, securing fixed number of jobs for females will be very productive step. It will be very beneficial socially including eliminating gender inequality. In addition it will be very beneficial for any individual woman as lot of opportunities will be created.
- Men do most of the high-level jobs. Should the government encourage a certain percentage of these jobs to be reserved for women?What is your opinion on that? 56
- Modern technology now allows rapid and uncontrolled access to and exchange of information Far from being beneficial this is a danger to our societies To what extent do you agree or disagree 82
- Nowadays more and more foreign students are going to English Speaking countries to learn the international language English It is undoubtedly true that studying English in an English speaking country is the best way but it is not the only way t 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 86, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly discriminated. Mostly only men are at high end posts. Some people argue that a...
^^
Line 1, column 198, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
...centage in these jobs for females. I am agree with the statement and I will discuss t...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 211, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'stronger' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: stronger
...an females as they ate considered to be more stronger. Likewise it is believed that more work...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 226, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Likewise,
...hey ate considered to be more stronger. Likewise it is believed that more work can be de...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 290, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...that more work can be derived from men. Thus if officials secure some jobs for femal...
^^^^
Line 5, column 132, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...r before may led to develop more ideas. Moreover women are more patient than men. They c...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 166, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...uding eliminating gender inequality. In addition it will be very beneficial for any indi...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, likewise, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 41.998997996 48% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1037.0 1615.20841683 64% => OK
No of words: 207.0 315.596192385 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00966183575 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 4.20363070211 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55898238777 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 176.041082164 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.599033816425 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 341.1 506.74238477 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.2975951904 59% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.6202705716 49.4020404114 40% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 61.0 106.682146367 57% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.1764705882 20.7667163134 59% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 5.70588235294 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221851421425 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0777919800732 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542309472923 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145396521816 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0671559391157 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 13.0946893788 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.3 50.2224549098 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.89 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 9.78957915832 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.1190380762 67% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.