Millions of dollars are spent on space research every year. Some people argue that the money should be spent on improving living standards on Earth. Do you agree or disagree?
Recently, a topic of discussion is raising that government funding should be diverted toward improving the living standard of ordinary people instead of using it to discover other planets. there are both for advocating and against this view, I believe it depends on different reasons.
it is undeniable that the exploration on space annual basis without caring about huge budget brings out negative growth. Initially, the government should spend money on improving the fundamental life of the disadvantaged. In other words, the globe present-days is facing lots of harsh situation relating to thirsty, starving, poverty, and so forth, so it is very noteworthy that the legislators need to use currency to address those tough problems. For instance, people who still live in a remote, difficult, mountainous areas are the individuals must be provided a huge funding to amend their life being better. As a result, the authority's priority right now is addressing the ugly circumstances of entire citizens and making total resident’s life become balanced.
However, I am more convinced that space programmes contribute considerably to the well-being of the earth in some aspects. Firstly, our planet is now facing an unprecedented resource problem, which can be tackled only by discovering and mining new resources on space. In addition, the overuse and scarcity of some resources on the earth is a severe problem, so those rare metals such as gold, silver, and so forth although rare on earth, might abound on other planets. Secondly, the world’s population is now growing to a stage that requiring human have to find out another replacing place where can be suitable for people’s re-settlement off the planet. Particularly, there are countless planets orbiting stars throughout the universe, one can be confident that at least one of them is consistent for our second home planet if we have trouble about our ecosystem in not so far day. For example, Mars, bearing a close resemblance to the earth, is considered a potential backup.
In conclusion, while reasons can be given to justify that space research is crucial enough to pay gigantic budget to discover in place of getting those cash to reforming human’s living standard, I think this is not an accurate statement under any circumstances.
- The charts below show the reasons why people want to leave the UK and work in other countries and why some people want to stay at the UK 78
- The percentage and exact time weekly males and females spent on house tasks in 2010 of a country 84
- The charts below shoe the percentage of government spending and of participants between 18 and 24 years old for education and training in 2010 84
- People nowadays sleep less than they used to in the past What do you think is the reason behind this What are the effects on individuals and people around them 89
- The diagram below shows what an office building looks at present and plans on future development 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 190, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
... of using it to discover other planets. there are both for advocating and against thi...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...eve it depends on different reasons. it is undeniable that the exploration on s...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, well, while, at least, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1941.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 370.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24594594595 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94000019876 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616216216216 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 605.7 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.1401662711 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.642857143 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4285714286 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.2857142857 7.06120827912 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177650118453 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0597055431547 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506564508776 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106728867568 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0129927201813 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.