Mobile telephones have brought many benefits but they have also negative effects. Do the disadvantages of having mobile phones outweigh the advantages ?
Technology like mobile telephone have brought many positive effects but they also have some negative impacts. I support the idea that the benefits of mobile phones are bigger than the drawback ones.
First of all, mobile phones have some negative impacts in human's life. Mobile phones can cause serious health problems to all of the users. For example, most of the gadget users suffer cancer because of the radiation that is produced by mobile phones. Besides, illegal business like prostitution use gadgets as their main media to run their business. The prostitutes usually use gadgets to contact and communicate each other. It makes them cannot be traced by the police.
In the other hand, mobile phones can help humans to solve their problems in daily life. Mobile phones are the main device that is used by humans as the way to communicate each other. In addition, mobile phones nowadays are often used to entertain the users. They often download games and they can play games practically.
People can also use their mobile phones to take pictures and listen to music. Gadgets have become a device that have enough capabilities to replace both MP4 players and cameras. It is a must in these days for people to have their own gadgets. The main reason is because mobile phones are a small devices and it is easy to use. Even though it only has a small size, mobile phones are the best device to be purchased nowadays.
In conclusion, mobile phones might cause some serious health problems to the users, but mobile phones are very useful and very important for humans because smartphones can solve problems that human had and communicating using smartphones is very easy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-10 | bryan arden | 56 | view |
| 2020-09-10 | Griffen | 11 | view |
| 2020-09-10 | Calvin Putra | 67 | view |
| 2020-09-10 | Nicholas Sukardi | 84 | view |
| 2020-09-07 | benedict yaslim | 81 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 123, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...es can cause serious health problems to all of the users. For example, most of the gadget ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, so, for example, in addition, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1401.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93309859155 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35022220984 2.80592935109 84% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496478873239 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.1581751075 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.8333333333 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7777777778 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365737281605 0.244688304435 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127655835688 0.084324248473 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126414719709 0.0667982634062 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248023081654 0.151304729494 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.164421731457 0.056905535591 289% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.0946893788 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.