Modern technology now allows rapid and uncontrolled access to and exchange of information. Far from being beneficial, this is a danger to our societies. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"></p><div style="text-align: start;"><span style="background-image: initial; background-position: initial; background-size: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; line-height: 107%; font-size: 17.6px;">In</span><span style="background-image: initial; background-position: initial; background-size: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; font-size: 14.5pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: "Lucida Sans Unicode", sans-serif;"> the global era, there are more benefits which </span><span class="hiddengrammarerror" style="font-size: 1.1em;"><span pre="which " style="text-align: start; cursor: default;">was made</span></span><span style="font-size: 1.1em; text-align: start;"> by modern technology especially internet to expand the </span><span style="font-size: 1.1em;">information and transferring the knowledge massively. One important aspect of </span><span style="font-size: 1.1em;">these benefits is all of people </span><span class="hiddengrammarerror" style="font-size: 1.1em; text-align: justify;"><span pre="people " style="text-align: start; cursor: default;">have the opportunity</span></span><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> for uploading and </span><span style="font-size: 1.1em;">transferring the information into the website and social media by easily, in </span><span style="font-size: 1.1em;">everywhere and every time. </span></div><p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size: 14.5pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: "Lucida Sans Unicode", sans-serif; background-image: initial; background-position: initial; background-size: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial;">However, in my view I would like to agree to the statement that there are also negative impact which </span><span class="hiddengrammarerror"><span pre="which " style="text-align: start; cursor: default;">was made by the</span></span><span style="text-align: start;"> modern technology for the society. I hold this view for some reasons which </span><span class="hiddengrammarerror"><span pre="which " style="text-align: start; cursor: default;">are set</span></span><span style="text-align: start;"> out below. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size: 14.5pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: "Lucida Sans Unicode", sans-serif; background-image: initial; background-position: initial; background-size: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial;">First, I would like to argue that modern technology are easily </span><span class="hiddensuggestion"><span pre="easily " style="text-align: start; cursor: default;">utilized</span></span><span style="text-align: start;"> by anonymous writer for uploading fake news or hoax information. According to Research Centre for Communication Studies, Australian National University stated that 65% news which </span><span class="hiddengrammarerror"><span pre="which " style="text-align: start; cursor: default;">was existed</span></span><span style="text-align: start;"> in the internet and social media are hoaxes and less credible. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size: 14.5pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: "Lucida Sans Unicode", sans-serif; background-image: initial; background-position: initial; background-size: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial;">On the other hand, modern technology also escalated the the number of post truth society in the world. this condition occurred due to the modern technology has successful to exchanging the literacy behaviour of the society from conventional literacy which it more scientific and credible to the internet literacy which it more instant and sensational, albeit it too difficult to </span><span class="hiddensuggestion"><span pre="to " style="text-align: start; cursor: default;">validate</span></span><span style="text-align: start;"> the data of it. Referring to International Journalist Institute (</span><span class="hiddenspellerror"><span pre="" style="text-align: start; cursor: default;">IJI</span></span><span style="text-align: start;">) stated that the internet era has successful to decline </span><span class="hiddengrammarerror"><span pre="decline " style="text-align: start; cursor: default;">the quality of</span></span><span style="text-align: start;"> people’s literacy </span><span class="hiddensuggestion"><span pre="literacy " style="text-align: start; cursor: default;">significantly</span></span><span style="text-align: start;">. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size: 14.5pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: "Lucida Sans Unicode", sans-serif; background-image: initial; background-position: initial; background-size: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial;">Taking everything into consideration, I believe that modern technology could be harmful for the society due to it </span><span class="hiddengrammarerror"><span pre="it " style="text-align: start; cursor: default;">could effected</span></span><span style="text-align: start;"> to the rise of incredible information which it should adopt by </span><span class="hiddengrammarerror"><span pre="by " style="text-align: start; cursor: default;">most of people</span></span><span style="text-align: start;"> as well as it also stimulated to increase the number of post truth society in the world.</span></p>
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-08-01 | fachryadul92 | 11 | view |
2019-08-01 | fachryadul92 | 67 | view |
2019-08-01 | fachryadul92 | 11 | view |
2019-05-01 | Unstopable | 56 | view |
2019-03-18 | Adler | 61 | view |
- Education for young people is important in many countries . However, the others think government should spend more money for education in adult population who can not read and write. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Amount spent on consumer goods 78
- Organized tours to remote areas and community are becoming more and more popular. Is this a positive or negative development for local people and the environment? 73
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 67
- The graph below shows the pollution levels in London between 1600 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 438, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
... hand, modern technology also escalated the the number of post truth society in the wor...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 438, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
... hand, modern technology also escalated the the number of post truth society in the wor...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 489, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ber of post truth society in the world. this condition occurred due to the modern te...
^^^^
Line 5, column 636, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'effect'
Suggestion: effect
...gn: start; cursor: default;'>could effected ^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 895, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...xt-align: start; cursor: default;'>most of people ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, well, as well as, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 6112.0 1615.20841683 378% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 556.0 315.596192385 176% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 10.9928057554 5.12529762239 214% => Less chars per word wanted.
Fourth root words length: 4.85588840946 4.20363070211 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 9.02930291684 2.80592935109 322% => Word_Length_SD is high.
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.375899280576 0.561755894193 67% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1556.1 506.74238477 307% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.8 1.60771543086 174% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 55.0 20.2975951904 271% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 274.279492489 49.4020404114 555% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 611.2 106.682146367 573% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 55.6 20.7667163134 268% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 7.7 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0110994810469 0.244688304435 5% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.011625566861 0.084324248473 14% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0124558926968 0.0667982634062 19% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0107182026359 0.151304729494 7% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00387055184493 0.056905535591 7% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 58.1 13.0946893788 444% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -85.87 50.2224549098 -171% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 26.0 7.44779559118 349% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 38.9 11.3001002004 344% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 47.35 12.4159519038 381% => Coleman_liau_index is high.
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.37 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 141.0 78.4519038076 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 43.0 9.78957915832 439% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 24.0 10.1190380762 237% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 26.0 10.7795591182 241% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.