Modern technology now allows rapid and uncontrolled access to and exchange of information. Far from being beneficial, this is a danger to our societies.
In the global era, there are more benefits which was made by modern technology especially internet to expand the information and transferring the knowledge massively. One important aspect of these benefits is all of people have the opportunity for uploading and transferring the information into the website and social media by easily, in everywhere and every time. However, in my view there are also negative impact which was made by the modern technology towards the rise of fake news and post truth society. I hold this view for some reasons which are set out below.
First, I would like to argue that the internet are easily utilized by anonymous writer for uploading fake news or hoax information. According to Research Centre for Communication Studies, Australian National University stated that 65% news which was existed in the internet and social media are hoaxes and less credible.
On the other hand, the internet also stimulated escalate the number of post truth society in the world. this condition occurred due to the internet has successful to exchanging the literacy behaviour of the society from conventional literacy which it more scientific and credible to the internet literacy which it more instant and sensational, albeit it too difficult to validate the data of it. Referring to International Journalist Institute (IJI) stated that the internet era has successful to decline the quality of people’s literacy significantly.
Taking everything into consideration, I believe that the internet era could be harmful for the society due to it could effected to the rise of incredible information which it should adopt by most of people as well as it also stimulated to increase the number of post truth society in the world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-01 | fachryadul92 | 11 | view |
| 2019-08-01 | fachryadul92 | 67 | view |
| 2019-08-01 | fachryadul92 | 11 | view |
| 2019-05-01 | Unstopable | 56 | view |
| 2019-03-18 | Adler | 61 | view |
- The graph below shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria between 1995 to 2005. 67
- The Bar Chart shows CO2 emissions for different form of transport in the European Union. The pie chart shows the percentage of European Union funds being spent on different forms of transport. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples 73
- Some people believe that success comes from hard work. Do you agree with and why? Give specific details and examples to support your opinion. 56
- The charts below give information about world spending and population.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makecomparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 73
- The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 105, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ber of post truth society in the world. this condition occurred due to the internet ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 120, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'effect'
Suggestion: effect
...harmful for the society due to it could effected to the rise of incredible information w...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 192, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...le information which it should adopt by most of people as well as it also stimulated to increa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, well, as well as, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1472.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21985815603 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91677390995 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510638297872 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.9856323491 49.4020404114 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.2 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.7 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0672745872737 0.244688304435 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0282015955785 0.084324248473 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0264126161104 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0378419690935 0.151304729494 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0205351192609 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.