Money spent on exploration of space is a complete waste, it could be spend more effectively on improvements of living of people. To what extent do u agree disagree
With an advancement in technology, space exploration is also burgeoning to a greater extent. Nowadays it a debatable issue that whether Government should invest the amount in space exploration or to devote the entire sum in fulfilling the basic needs of individuals. I counterbalance this notion as both aspects play a crucial role in our life. This essay will scrutinize both virtues and will give a sophisticated solution.
On the one hand, Advocates of the first viewpoint say that space exploration lends a helping hand in our development. It provides us several opportunities to know about the other cultures as well as to have a look outside the earth. To epitomize, through Chandrayaan, Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) made the stunning discovery of water on moon. In addition, it can also inform us about the coming troubles.
On the other hand, dwellers of several countries are confronting with various significant issues like poverty, illiteracy, income inequality and so on. These problems need an urgent step so that they can be minimized to some extent. In many developing countries, the populace cannot even get a single meal in a day and the adolescents have never visited a school. Moreover, there are numerous health issues which still have not any cure for Lung cancer, AIDS, HIV and much more. So spending a huge amount on space research is a waste.
Mulling over the topic, each coin has two sides similarly both aspects are indispensable for the betterment of homo-sapiens. Thus, it is advisable for countries who have certain issues to prioritise them so that they cannot become an obstacle in space research.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-01-23 | mabick_1527 | 85 | view |
| 2017-01-16 | Stephanie Kaushal | 79 | view |
- Nowadays, children play less with others and this has an impact on their development.What are reasons for this?Does it have a good or bad effect on children? 84
- The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000, 2005 and 2010 about one university. 11
- The chart and table below show customer satisfaction levels in the US with airlines and aspects of air travel in 1999, 2000 and 2007. 78
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989. 78
- The graphs show enrolment in different colleges in the Higher Colleges of Technology in 1999 93
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, moreover, similarly, so, still, thus, well, as to, in addition, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1384.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12592592593 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95446930749 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637037037037 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4082294076 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2666666667 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110317470422 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0374829457154 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0471757325044 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0600962024494 0.151304729494 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0274692798347 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.