More and more people are becoming seriously overweight. Some people think a solution can be to increase the price of fattening foods. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Obesity is becoming a worldwide issue as more and more people's determination becomes powerless against the appeal of fast foods. Therefore, there have been some suggestions regarding the possible necessity of government interference in the market to strengthen the resolution of the public with economic incentives, effectively halting the obesity pandemic. In my opinion, however, the detriments of this strategy and the existence of better alternatives proved its inadequateness.
First and foremost, while an increase in the cost of fattening food will undoubtedly act as an excellent deterrent to people's desires, unforeseen consequences may surface when implemented. For instance, a decrease in the customer in this industry may lead to a lack of consumption of the ingredients used to supply its massive demands. As such, the flooding of the market by such goods will be probable, which can lead to deflation in their prices, ultimately damaging the economy. Additionally, the significance of this approach is uncertain since the insatiable appetites of the clients might allow them to tolerate any elasticity in the outlays for their enjoyment, similar to policies targeting cigarette agencies, as the eagerness of the addicts granted enterprises immunity toward any price interventions.
On account of the cited drawbacks, a different set of recourses are recommended to tackle this concern. For instance, strict regulations on the production of sugary foods to guarantee their healthiness will be beneficial in lowering the rates of global overweight. In addition, efforts in educating and informing the population about the danger of obesity can create a psychological barrier to excess calorie input, warding off additional weight for people. The impacts from the application of these methods are gradual, but their effects will be more valuable than any spike in the expense of eatables.
In conclusion, despite the minor merits a hike in the payment for snacks might bring, the combination of unanticipated tribulations and more optimized replacement overshadowed them. Hence, an upturn in the price of fast food should be frowned upon.
- In some countries shopping online is replacing shopping at stores Discuss both the pros and cons of this trend 93
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve the growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 11
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Some people think that uniform at school is unnecessary and should be done away with while others disagree stating its benefits in helping to dissuade discrimination and division based on attire in an educational environment Discuss both viewpoints and gi 95
- The UN recently celebrated its 70th anniversary What benefits has it brought during this time Do you think the UN will last another 70 years 87
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 759, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'enterprises'' or 'enterprise's'?
Suggestion: enterprises'; enterprise's
...as the eagerness of the addicts granted enterprises immunity toward any price interventions...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, may, regarding, so, then, therefore, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1824.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54407294833 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17284756762 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623100303951 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.2239703427 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.307692308 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3076923077 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0769230769 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192640288379 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592385977053 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636237587443 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106416219314 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0222005465072 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.73 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 759, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'enterprises'' or 'enterprise's'?
Suggestion: enterprises'; enterprise's
...as the eagerness of the addicts granted enterprises immunity toward any price interventions...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, may, regarding, so, then, therefore, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1824.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54407294833 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17284756762 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623100303951 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.2239703427 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.307692308 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3076923077 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0769230769 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192640288379 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592385977053 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636237587443 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106416219314 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0222005465072 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.73 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.