These days, there has been an increasing number of people who are moving to cities with a hope of a better life, however, this situation leads to multiple adversities for not only the habitants but also the environment. This essay will demonstrate this viewpoint and suggest several remedies to enhance the quality of living in huge metropolis.
One of the knotty problems that migrants have to deal with is unstable employment opportunities. The settlers have to intensify their hands-on as well as soft skills such as stress coping mechanism to vie with others in this cut-throat labor market, otherwise, they need make a meager living at a variety of jobs. It is even a tragedy that the cost of living is likely to be much higher than it is in a small town or village, hence, this will be a worry for new citizens due to the starvation wages to afford the daily necessities. On environmental level, this immense flock may trigger city governments to substitute farmland and vacant lands with an array of houses. For that rationale, a significant rise in the amount of toxic emission has been seen in industrial towns. This drastic air pollution puts inhabitants of cities in a higher jeopardy of lung cancer, asthma attacks and other respiratory illnesses. Moreover, urban areas are reported to suffer from social evils such as high crime and poverty rates in comparison with rural areas. As a result, city life can be unhealthy and stressful.
Notwithstanding, these aforementioned problems can be addressed by various steps. First and foremost, in order to improve the quality of air in major metropolises, stricter regulations should be imposed to limit hazardous gas emissions and encourage the use of more environmentally friendly energy sources. Moreover, stricter laws need enacting to hinder crime. To cite an example, being punished with a prison sentence may make hard drinkers have a second thought. Therefore, this action would motivate drivers and burglars to reevaluate their actions, which in turn manipulating potential criminals into behaving themselves. Last but not least, the national state budget should be deployed to create more occupations in rural areas. Agricultural reform, for instance, will assist peasants earn money and have a stable income to adapt to the living standard.
In conclusion, governments could certainly implement a range of measures to enhance the quality of life for all city residents.
- Some people believe that studying online is more effective than studying on campus while others disagree Discuss both the views and provide your opinion 84
- As major cities in the world are growing today so do their problems What are problems for young people who are living in the cities as the result of continued growth How problems might be solved 84
- Students learn far more with their teachers than other sources Internet or television To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Students learn far more with their teachers than other sources Internet or television To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people believe that studying online is more effective than studying on campus while others disagree Discuss both the views and provide your opinion 61
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2051.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 395.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19240506329 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9129263983 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 176.041082164 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627848101266 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 644.4 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4272570706 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.944444444 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9444444444 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.94444444444 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245111939432 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715076070068 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.085113603369 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152068035345 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345289841495 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 78.4519038076 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2051.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 395.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19240506329 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9129263983 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 176.041082164 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627848101266 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 644.4 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4272570706 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.944444444 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9444444444 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.94444444444 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245111939432 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715076070068 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.085113603369 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152068035345 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345289841495 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 78.4519038076 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.