The development of information technology has changed our contemporary lives significantly, tele-work is becoming a more and more noticeable trend. While there are some advantages to working in the office, I do believe that working from home is more beneficial.
On one hand, there are several reasons that people disagree to work at home. Employers have more freedom at home, which resulting in low efficiency of working. By contrast, working with leaders and colleges will give pressure to workers. What’s more, working from home minimize the opportunity of face-face-face communication, which is more likely to produce the feeling of loneliness. Telecommuting workers can’t build the connection with people and teams in the industry. As a result, long-termed telecommuting might contribute to poor working performance, laziness and even detrimental health condition.
On the other hand, tele-work benefits not only individuals, but also employees and society. Firstly, as for employees, they can balanced their flexible work schedules and enjoy a more healthy life. They can also save numerous time and budget on transportation. According to a recent survey, it takes workers in Beijing average 2 hours to commute every day after exhausting work. Secondly, on the side of companies, they can invest less money renting spacious offices. Thirdly, it will reduce the possibility of traffic congestion, especially during rush hours and the air pollution by less consumption of fossil fuels. Obviously, it is not university suitable for everyone because telecommuting requires high self-discipline and time-managing capacity, but with the help of computer technology, employees completely can work at work without many difficulties.
After having discussed the most pertinent points of issues, I’m convinced that the advantages of tele-work outweighs its disadvantages, considering the benefits brought to employers, companies and city transportation.
- The graph below shows Long-Term International Migration in UK, 1999-2008.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- It is generally accepted that families are not as close as they used to be.Give some reasons why this change has happened and suggest how families could be brought closer together. 11
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world.Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 89
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree. What are other measures do you think might be effective? 78
- In many countries, people do not recycle their rubbish as much as they could. Why do you think this is? What can be done to change this? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 116, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s significantly, tele-work is becoming a more and more noticeable trend. While t...
^^
Line 3, column 332, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rtunity of face-face-face communication, which is more likely to produce the feel...
^^
Line 5, column 129, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'balance'
Suggestion: balance
...ty. Firstly, as for employees, they can balanced their flexible work schedules and enjoy...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 416, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rk. Secondly, on the side of companies, they can invest less money renting spaci...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, while, as for, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1687.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.83737024221 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28682205107 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650519031142 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4535372218 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.4375 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0625 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307947561779 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0902030708775 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0890717714924 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182589992915 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133732701942 0.056905535591 235% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.3 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.1 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.