"More and more schools allow fast food restaurant to sell their products to their students. Is this a positive or negative development"
There is an increase in the number of fast food restaurants selling their products in schools nowadays. This tendency has detrimental impacts, particularly on the well-being of many students.
There are some reasons why a student's ability to learn is negatively affected by junk foods. Firstly, the introduction of fast food in school has directly encouraged children to eat more and more these unhealthy foods. The excessive consumption of processed foods leads to overall laziness and fatigue in class since those foods are high in calories and fat. As a result, student are not able to concentrate on their lesson. Therefore, their final results are not good as others who eat balanced school meals. Secondly, many studies proved that the overconsumption of junk foods indirectly lowers the human brain's capacity. If students eat those kind of foods regularly, their long-term productivity will be reduced seriously when they grow up later on.
Eating too much unhealthy foods not only causes mental problems but also be the culprit of many different fatal physical health issues. These days, in some developed countries, the more number of fast food restaurants goes up, the more cases of serious health conditions are recorded. Take the US for instance, whose students eat hamburger and fried chicken at the school's canteen on a daily basic, and the rate of obesity as well as cardiovascular problems are nearly the highest across the world. Moreover, the high level of sugar and unhealthy fats in processed foods have been proved are the root cause of many other potential fatal illnesses.
In conclusion, the development of fast food restaurant services in schools is completely negative.
- More and more schools allow fast food restaurant to sell their products to their students Is this a positive or negative development 61
- The availability of entertainment such as video games on handheld devices are harmful to individual and to the society they live in To what extent do you agree and disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 30, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...udents. There are some reasons why a students ability to learn is negatively affected...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 608, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'brains'' or 'brain's'?
Suggestion: brains'; brain's
... junk foods indirectly lowers the human brains capacity. If students eat those kind of...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 641, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'those kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; those kinds
... human brains capacity. If students eat those kind of foods regularly, their long-term pro...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 92, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...tal problems but also be the culprit of many different fatal physical health issues. These day...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 366, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'schools'' or 'school's'?
Suggestion: schools'; school's
... eat hamburger and fried chicken at the schools canteen on a daily basic, and the rate ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1432.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24542124542 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77476819077 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.608058608059 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7820072217 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.285714286 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0714285714 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.402497306221 0.244688304435 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132201433832 0.084324248473 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105795823224 0.0667982634062 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.250881027898 0.151304729494 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0567988296713 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.