most countries want to improve their standard of living through economic development, while others think social values are lost as a result. Do you think the advantages of economic development outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays, many countries want to develop their economy in order to improve people’s living standard. However, some people hold the view that the consequence of this situation is the loss of social values. In this essay, I will examine both sides of the debate and seek a conclusion.
To begin with, it is undeniable that economic development may better satisfy people’s daily needs. With higher salary which are provided by better economy, people have more budget to purchase daily goods such as clothing and foods. What is more, their lifestyle can be improved by traveling abroad and other entertainment ways they used to have no chance to enjoy. In addition, with the high-speed development of economy, people can enjoy better vital public services such as public transportation and medical services since governments have enough fund to update them.
On the other hand, however, some people fear that modern people will become more materialistic and less altruism because of the development of economy. When their daily life is associated only with wealth, people seem to care little about other parts of the society such as helping others and team spirits. For example, they spend all day in working and then care nothing about people around them. Besides, people also will face the problem of family relationship. It is noticeable that people become indifferent in modern life, and the potential cause is their busy job which takes up their daily life and makes them have no time to interact with their family members.
To summarize, theire is no doubt that development of economy can maintain people’s daily needs as it can provides higher salaries for people to enjoy their life. However, it will have negative impacts on social values too, such as being more materialistic and less altruism and alienating with their family members. In the final analysis, I believe that the advantages of economic development are more than the disadvantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-04 | Frank Chen | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-04 | Frank Chen | 73 | view |
| 2019-01-03 | Frank Chen | 73 | view |
- Schooling is no longer necessary, since more and more information is accessible on the Internet, and students can study just as well at home. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The bar chart shows the percentage of dependents in five different countries around the world in 2000 and 2050. 73
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 73
- Some people believe that students in schools learn better when they study in groups Others say school students learn better when they study on their own Discuss both views and give your own opinion 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 111, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'provide'
Suggestion: provide
...ain people's daily needs as it can provides higher salaries for people to enjoy the...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, if, may, so, then, for example, in addition, no doubt, such as, to begin with, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1657.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19435736677 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69340481483 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539184952978 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.686552515 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.466666667 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2666666667 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.93333333333 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139052416486 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577168185192 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596996965685 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102588371099 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036945608904 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.