The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
Science is one of the most essential aspects of human life. Most arguments stated that the purpose of science must be to upgrade the standard of living. From my perspective, there are more merits on the approval side.
Technical advancement is the result of the scientific revolution. It alleviates partial of the hardship that modern people carry on. Making life becomes more convenient by inventing smart devices to facilitate daily tasks, technical advancement is considered to be a versatile invention of all ages. To be clearer, driverless car was introduced to demanding mobility needs, which is reasonable for even elderly and disabled people to go out. That is to say, integrating technology into pragmatics is cater to each individual needs.
Go along with the evolution of science, the medical industry is also improved. More and more patients overcame serious diseases that are thought to not have any magical cases. In practice, cell reproduction has been investigated to cure cancers. Even though it is incompletely possible; however, it received good feedback based on its substantial merit as lengthened their life expectancy. Treating cancer will be visible soon. Or closer, there are really wide new technological operations, in which after being sewed, the scars would not be left. In other words, science is always focused on people's health.
To recapitulate, it is really crucial for people's lives to have science, as the starting point of science is human needs and demands. With two aspects having been mentioned, science's purpose should be placed on people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
- The graphs below show the development of Brindell from 1800 to 2000 Summarize the key features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
- In many countries around the world rural people are moving to cities so the population in the countryside is decreasing Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 11
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparis 61
- The most important aim of science should be to improve people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience Write at least 250 words 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 500, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'catered'.
Suggestion: catered
...tegrating technology into pragmatics is cater to each individual needs. Go along wit...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, really, so, then, in other words, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1332.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28571428571 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85684522259 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.65873015873 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.1705680667 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.3529411765 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8235294118 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.94117647059 7.06120827912 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146543208244 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0420273990709 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0344032852982 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0927063456455 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029461546668 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.81 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.