Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give

Essay topics:

Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects. Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Write at least 250 words.

In the modern day and age, students are evolving to adapt themselves reasonably to the society flow. This is the reason why there were two lines of argument, one preferred to capture the general acknowledgment based on their favorite, while others dismissed and said practical experience is much more essential. In these upcoming paragraphs, I will discuss respectively two sides.
First and foremost, learning has to originate from the favor. Choosing whatever subjects that students demand to learn can create a space that is big enough for creativity to grow. A person will be an expertise if he can be applied in his interest. Specifically, when parents bring up a kid, it is vital for them to let the kid learn freely with surrounding things. This happens alike to the way all genres of learning. It is easier for a learner to assimilate the theoretical knowledge if those units prefer to their fancy.
Otherwise, it will not be overstated even though it is extremely essential to have a certain level of practical skills in the job market later. It comes to be smoother if someone invests all his time to get a certificate or a qualification for the career. Common sense is that post-graduates cannot apply to any company due to having an excellent degree, just because they have not fulfilled the experience requirements. Therefore, it poses the question of whether using that time to improve practical capacity instead of learning theory as there are many former doing the same way. For instance, Bill Gates, gave up his aglow study journey in Havard to start up his own career. He now still has been one of the trillionaires for decades and seems not to be kicked out back then.
In the last words, I suppose that having entirely two things is the best option. Learning interesting subjects and raising practical skills are evenly valuable. However, should have an election, I tend to stand more on gaining a higher level of practical acknowledgment as in my nation's traditional way of learning is that learners have to follow the units set by the university. It will be better for students to balance their study life with pragmatic experience through voluntary campaigns or training courses.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-12 ophongcute@gmail.com 84 view
Essays by user Lynne Dao :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 441, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
...ience requirements. Therefore, it poses the question of whether using that time to improve practical ca...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 90, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to interest'.
Suggestion: to interest
...two things is the best option. Learning interesting subjects and raising practical skills a...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, still, then, therefore, while, as to, for instance, i suppose

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1834.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 372.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93010752688 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83471533902 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596774193548 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9113321034 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5263157895 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5789473684 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.47368421053 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162811258097 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0461563368037 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.035779757775 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0969452393164 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0155326253875 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 441, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
...ience requirements. Therefore, it poses the question of whether using that time to improve practical ca...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 90, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to interest'.
Suggestion: to interest
...two things is the best option. Learning interesting subjects and raising practical skills a...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, still, then, therefore, while, as to, for instance, i suppose

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1834.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 372.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93010752688 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83471533902 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596774193548 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9113321034 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5263157895 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5789473684 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.47368421053 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162811258097 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0461563368037 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.035779757775 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0969452393164 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0155326253875 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.