Most large companies nowadays operate multi-nationally. To what extent do multinational companies have responsibility towards local communities in which they operate?
In these days, there are a number of big companies trying to expand their branches and business size to other nations. While this benefits these companies in some extents, their responsibility to the local areas where they operate their business is high too.
First of all, they have to take reponsibility to the economy of the local communities. When taking place in these areas, these large companies also lend a hand to investigate a large number of local people working for their business. As a result, the rate of unemployment is reduced and the local citizens will have a better standards of living. Furthermore, large businesses could provide an amount of money for the local government through paying taxes, which later help the areas improve their quality of medical and educational services.
Secondly, the large companies also play an important role in preserving the local environment. They should have to sign a contract with the local government in order not to destroy the environment there and ensure their long-term growth in that place. For example, in their working time, the factories should take some more steps to dispose the waste properlly and not dump their throw-away products right to the nearby communities. Moreover, they should be in charge of the loss of local’s natural resources. It is undeniable that some businesses prefer using as much the amount of resources as to increase their profits. However, they need to share hands to protect and decline the damage they have done. In particular, growing more trees after cutting down them for paper production will be the best idea to preserve the area’s natural beauty and maintain their profits in the long run.
In addition, when the companies operate multi-nationally, they should take higher responsibility to the local communities in both economy and environment. This benefits not only to the local areas but themselves in the near future.
- In the future it seems it will be more difficult to live on Earth Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planets to live such as Mars To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- Co2 emissions in between 1967 and 2007 78
- The diagram below shows how solar panels can be used to provide electricity for domestic use 89
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourists facilities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 78
- The pictures below show the recycling process of wasted glass bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 100
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 126, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...d business size to other nations. While this benefits these companies in some extent...
^^^^
Line 2, column 175, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...mpanies also lend a hand to investigate a large number of local people working for their business...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, as to, for example, in addition, in particular, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1620.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14285714286 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76752939403 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530158730159 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1779983608 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1333333333 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246580688327 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0913317273492 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0783202635916 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178228759692 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0547145663439 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.