Academic subjects are now being prioritized in most educational Institutions, wherein authorities have now started substituting athletics & Physical Training classes with school subjects. These institutions believe that outdoor activities are a waste of time and priority should be given to subjects that will improve the marks of students. I totally disagree with this view.
Academics are, no doubt, the most important aspect of students’ lives. Children need to concentrate on their studies in order to achieve good results, which will have an impact on their future preferences. This choice will help them to choose a career of their desire, which will in turn be beneficial to earn good salary and improve the standard of living. However, claiming that sports is not beneficial to children and should not be included in the school curriculum is unacceptable.
Outdoor activities such as Physical Training, volleyball, cricket etc., play an important role in the physical development of children. It not only improves the development of a child, but also helps in enhancing the imagination of children. This results in strong growth of a child both physically and mentally. Games and sports help children to relive their stress of studies and school pressure to perform well. A rested and relaxed mind is always able to perform more efficiently than a stressed out mind. Secondly, games and sports help to develop the sportsmanship in children. Success and failure should be accepted gracefully and which better place to learn this, than through sports and games.
In conclusion, while academic subjects are important to achieve success in life, sports and physical activities are essential for the overall development and growth of children. Institutions should make it compulsory to have one hour of outdoor activities along with other academic subjects, only then can the future generation be ready to take up new challenges as we all know health is wealth.
- A new neighbour has moved in next door and has taken your main rubbish bin.Write a letter to your new neighbour requesting that they return the item. In the letter:– Explain that new bins must be sourced from the local council– Request that the person 73
- You recently moved to a new house and you want to invite an old friend to stay with you. Write a letter to your friend. In your letter - invite him to stay and suggest a date- briefly describe the new house and garden- say why you like your new house 73
- Due to the development and rapid expansion of supermarkets in some countries, many small, local businesses are unable to compete. Some people think that the closure of local business will bring about the death of local communities.To what extent do you ag 56
- In Britain, when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other old people where there are nurses to look after them. Sometimes the government has to pay for this care.Who do you think should pay for this care, the government or the family?Gi 73
- You live in a room in college which you share with another student. However, there are many problems with this arrangement and you find it very difficult to work.Write a letter to the accommodation officer at the college. In the letter,• describe the si 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, well, while, in conclusion, no doubt, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1669.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36655948553 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89344624061 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559485530547 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7392618015 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.3125 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4375 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0625 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200330080172 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715160366412 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434695685805 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121476440478 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256341015199 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.