Most successful inventions do not rely on complicated technology. In fact, some of the world’s greatest inventions have been very simple things.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Inventions that are contributed from complex technology are extremely worldwide. However, a lot of the most successful inventions do not involve high-tech. In reality, some of the most significant inventions have been iconic things, but still have huge impacts on people's lives. I totally agree with this statement. In this essay, I'll discuss and give my opinions.
To commence with, in order to upgrade lives, people in the past created things based on their simple ideas, especially when they needed something handy that could help them deal with problems. To be specific, they monitored the environment and promoted available materials around them. For instance, a man used graphite combined with clay and then heated by the furnace to make pencils. This method has been used until now.
On the other hand, unsophisticated inventions are the foundation for contemporary devices and gadgets that people are using nowadays. In other words, people upgrade and modernize plain inventions to make them more effective and more diverse. For example, a long long time ago, people used eyeglasses, which had 2 pieces of glass connected by a frame. Based on that invention, scientists created more types such as sunglasses or special ones used for only certain activities. Those spectacles are now fashionable, and some are installed smart equipment.
To conclude, I firmly believe that those inventions are established from simple ideas and they are the foundation for modern gadgets nowadays
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-01 | Nguyên-MTTN | 56 | view |
| 2014-01-27 | AJIGAYUH | 75 | view |
- The bar chart below describes some changes about the percentage of people were born in Australia and who were born outside Australia living in urban rural and town between 1995 and 2010 67
- Many people make friends through social sites and chat rooms Others believe that it is not a good idea to make friends without meeting them face to face Do you agree or disagree with this statement Give your own opinion and relevant examples 56
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional live and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Many women are in workforce today but only few are in senior positions What causes this phenomenon Suggest possible solutions that would resolve this issue 73
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions Do you agree or disagree 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nology are extremely worldwide. However, a lot of the most successful inventions ...
^^
Line 1, column 333, Rule ID: ILL_I_LL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'I'll'?
Suggestion: I'll
...ree with this statement. In this essay, Ill discuss and give my opinions. To com...
^^^
Line 5, column 258, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: long
...ective and more diverse. For example, a long long time ago, people used eyeglasses, which...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, still, then, for example, for instance, such as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1261.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 235.0 315.596192385 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36595744681 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78651606799 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.646808510638 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 394.2 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.6726771515 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.0666666667 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6666666667 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.93333333333 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187587868227 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620748241552 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0725324659276 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116839094084 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103686000377 0.056905535591 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.57 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nology are extremely worldwide. However, a lot of the most successful inventions ...
^^
Line 1, column 333, Rule ID: ILL_I_LL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'I'll'?
Suggestion: I'll
...ree with this statement. In this essay, Ill discuss and give my opinions. To com...
^^^
Line 5, column 258, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: long
...ective and more diverse. For example, a long long time ago, people used eyeglasses, which...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, still, then, for example, for instance, such as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1261.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 235.0 315.596192385 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36595744681 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78651606799 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.646808510638 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 394.2 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.6726771515 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.0666666667 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6666666667 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.93333333333 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187587868227 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620748241552 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0725324659276 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116839094084 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103686000377 0.056905535591 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.57 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.