In most successful organisations, some people believe that communication between managers and workers is important, while other people said that other factors are more significant. What is your opinion?
It is sometimes argued that interaction between managers and staffs is the most essential factor to make companies succeed. However, other people believe that there are several other factors contributing to organizations’ success. From my perspective, I align with the latter opinion.
On the one hand, communication between leaders and employees plays a key role in the success of companies. The conveyance from managers to workers provides a roadmap for all the team to follow. This can minimize misunderstandings, reduce ambiguity, consequently enhance the alignment of effort towards common targets. Moreover, the communication also provides chances for employees to express their ideas, concerns and feedback that effectively empowers individuals and fosters a culture of collaboration and innovation.
Effective communication is essential, however, there are still many other equally important factors that can contribute to the success of a company. Initially, recruitment has a direct impact on the culture of organizations. It ensures that companies acquire the right skills and competencies required for its operation. For example, hiring individuals with responsible, extensive experience,.... can enhance the quality of work and contribute to the overall efficiency of the workforce. Furthermore, a reward system can provide a stimulating working environment. As a result, it can either motivate employees archive high quality performance or retain talented employees.
To sum up, while I accept that communication between managers and workers is vital for a company to achieve success, I still believe that other factors, especially the recruitment and reward system are also equally essential for an organization to thrive.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-25 | Phuong1810 | 61 | view |
| 2021-11-02 | Truong Khanh Ha | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-03 | Hân Hân_1515 | 73 | view |
| 2020-11-16 | KatNguyen | 56 | view |
| 2020-08-01 | 9ngóntay | 84 | view |
- Internet technology means people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego California and the rest of the world 73
- The line graph below shows the average monthly temperatures in three major cities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The pie charts below show the coffee production coffee consumption and the profit distribution around the world Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children s sports between 2008 and 2014 The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 392, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...s with responsible, extensive experience,.... can enhance the quality of work and ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, however, moreover, so, still, while, for example, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1497.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.8937007874 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36399526351 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590551181102 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.0388087635 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9333333333 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250710339258 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734220181499 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101022517305 0.0667982634062 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168850234802 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10263764767 0.056905535591 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.86 50.2224549098 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.59 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.