It is certainly true that college graduates earn significant more salary than lower educated people in society. Although I accept that graduates earn far more than other. However, I disagree with the idea that they pay whole fees to finish their education degree.
Firstly, higher qualified people are assets of our society. The time they spent to gain education and skilled eventually beneficial for community. It is not abnormal for graduates to event new technology which provides advance features to access information such as latest I phone, and computer technology in this way their skills and education helps to built future of nation. Moreover, this new technology especially in health discovered by graduates provides assistance for sick people. Brain scanner for instance provides accurate result of patents problems within a few second it not possible in early life. As a result, graduate deserve some subsidies fees instead of pay full amount.
Secondly, obtain graduate degree is symbol of their scarification, individuals spent enormous time and sometime they give up their earlier job to get graduate degree. They spend their huge amount of time to reading and finishing assignment instead of part time work. In addition, higher qualification is expansive today therefore individual cannot afford to pay full amount of their education fee without earning. Hence, it is clear that individuals’ graduates need some financial help to finish their education.
In conclusion, it is certain that well educated people receive more money than other people. However their education symbol of their hard work and helps society in many ways, therefore I think that they not require paying full fees of education.
- The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- the table below gives information on the frequency of using internet by adults in one European country between 2006 to 2010
- The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in London, 2000-2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The charts show information about children learning musical instruments in 1996 and 2016 in the UK 91
- The table below shows information about the population of New Zealand from 2011 to 2012 by age group
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 113, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... than lower educated people in society. Although I accept that graduates earn far more t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 572, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun second seems to be countable; consider using: 'few seconds'.
Suggestion: few seconds
...ate result of patents problems within a few second it not possible in early life. As a res...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 252, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...ing and finishing assignment instead of part time work. In addition, higher qualification...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 94, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...e receive more money than other people. However their education symbol of their hard wo...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43703703704 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69420961176 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588888888889 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5182720245 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8666666667 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341049134587 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119949037596 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710626607511 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233333583684 0.151304729494 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0800584284535 0.056905535591 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.