Motor vehicle crashes are one of the leading causes of teen deaths. To prevent such road accidents, the government should ban people under 24 to drive motorcycles.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The number of car accident deaths has always been high, however the recent years showed the rising statistics, which could not be left without any attention and control.
The government took into account that road traffic accidents are at the top of the youth death causes and initiated the legislative proposal, which forbids humans up to 24 to drive bikes. Although the mortality rate of the young drivers is high, I cannot fully agree that such restrictive measures will improve the situation and limit this statistic.
To begin with, motorcycles cannot become the only vehicle type unable for usage of chosen group of people. Automobiles, scooters, bikes and even hoverboard might lead, at least, to a heavy injury or be fatal to the young driver. If the traffic regulations, general moral rules and safety are not observed or considered as optional, any sort of behaviour results in negative consequences. For example, my fellow was given a modern and well-equipped car as his 18th birthday present, however he got a car accident and felt into a coma for 2 weeks, as he ignored the learning of the highway code. Thus, prohibition of motorcycles demonstrates a partial focus on the problem and, unfortunately, this measure will not decrease the total number of deaths on the roads.
Moreover, the age has never stated (has nothing to deal with) the driving manner of the person. Only the character of the driver, the attention to other road users, excluding unforeseen circumstances, may predict possible behaviour on the highway. What is more, drivers over 24, are not insured from errors and crashes, which are also the possible causes of death. For example, in Moscow one of the most fatal car accident, provoked by a man with a long driving experience, took the lives of over 80 victims. That is why, age limitations will not transform the data seriously, because the problem is hidden deeper.
To conclude I would like to add that prohibitions rarely excuses themselves.
Only the complex work of all road users obeying the traffic rules and being accurate on highways will lower the death rates, caused by such unnatural reasons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-03 | nhathoang | 84 | view |
| 2020-06-11 | TheRealUchiah | 78 | view |
| 2020-06-10 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 96 | view |
- For a long time art has been considered an essential part of all cultures in the world. However, nowadays people’s values have changed, and we tend to consider science, technology and business more important than arts.What do you think are the causes of 89
- The government s investment in arts music and theatre is a waste of money Governments should invest these funds in public services instead To what extent do you agree with this statement 78
- Some people enjoy change and they look forward to new experiences Others like their lives to stay the same and they do not change their usual habits Compare these two approaches to life Which approach do you prefer Explain why 73
- The government should ban smoking in all public places even though this would restrict some other people s freedoms Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer 89
- Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification Discuss both these views and give your opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 91, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to group'
Suggestion: to group
...vehicle type unable for usage of chosen group of people. Automobiles, scooters, bikes...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 40, Rule ID: NOT_NOTHING[1]
Message: Double negation. You probably should say 'anything'.
Suggestion: anything
... Moreover, the age has never stated has nothing to deal with the driving manner of the ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, well, at least, for example, sort of, to begin with, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1792.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01960784314 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69181408182 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610644257703 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5175074201 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.466666667 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170377895961 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0493818912798 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464030648415 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.078029180628 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510459088362 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.