In the new millennium, education and achieving a high score at schools is of paramount importance not only for the pupils but also for their parents.
In the new millennium, education and achieving a high score at schools is of paramount importance not only for the pupils but also for their parents. In such a context, it is claimed that schools should only reward the best students getting the highest score. However, others mentioned that praising students demonstrating progress is far more important. By my reckoning, each method has its own advantages which should not be ignored.
On the one hand, keeping the best pupils motivated by giving them various incentives is quite important for a multitude of cogent reasons. Firstly, these students are more likely to be successful in their studies and may contribute more to the welfare of their citizens in the future compared with other pupils. As a case in point, nearly all doctors and engineers performed really well during their education and as an adult, they can address the critical needs of other people. Secondly, top students act as a role model for their classmates and less successful students could be promoted to do well academically by imitating them.
On the other hand, acclaiming children who do their best and achieved higher grades compared with their previous scores is critical as well. By doing so, they possibly gain more motivation to study better. As an illustration, if teachers and educational planners reward these students they gain a higher level of self-confidence which contribute to do well in other sectors of their life. This tactic, incontrovertibly, keep them motivated throughout their academic life.
To sum up, it is crystal clear that while rewarding top students is quite beneficial both for the students and society, appraising pupils showing improvement is vital as well.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-28 | Mohammad Khaleghi Esfahani | 61 | view |
- The bar chart compares the volume of male and female participating in different evening courses, namely drama, painting, sculpture, and language; while the pie chart shows the ages of these attendees. 89
- The illustration demonstrates the proportion of graduates unable to find an appropriate occupation in a specific European nation over the course of a two year. 78
- The line graph demonstrates the volume of travelers at the underground station in London. 78
- The bar chart compares the volume of rentals and sales of films over the course of a decade in a specific shop. 61
- The table demonstrates the results of three surveys conducted in a specific university in different time span in terms of pupils perspective regarding diverse sectors of the university. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, well, while, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18637992832 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84047861325 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584229390681 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0223725846 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.307692308 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4615384615 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92307692308 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335005670586 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132189062334 0.084324248473 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.254121260227 0.0667982634062 380% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20980127255 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.17916674296 0.056905535591 315% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.